|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Bombtrack
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:01 PM Original message |
Gore plotted to stop dems from winning the house to stop rival Gephardt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:02 PM Response to Original message |
1. Why didn't you post this back in the day? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bombtrack
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:07 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. I think the "I bring this up because" is where you should start reading |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scott Lee
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:09 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Are you buying this, Terwilliger? *snicker* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:11 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. You bring it up b/c Gore just dissed your choice and it hurts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bombtrack
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:16 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. It shows Gore's having an alterior motive is a good possibility |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:21 PM Response to Reply #17 |
23. it shows that your vision of ulterior motives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhoCountsTheVotes
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 09:35 PM Response to Reply #23 |
52. I saw Al Gore and Richard Gephardt fighting in this 1988 video: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:03 PM Response to Original message |
2. Wow! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemNoir
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:06 PM Response to Original message |
3. Oh my |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K-W
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:06 PM Response to Original message |
4. Rival in what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bombtrack
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:09 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. the nomination for president |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elcondor
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:18 PM Response to Reply #11 |
19. They were rivals in 1988 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bombtrack
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:25 PM Response to Reply #19 |
26. and Gephardt would have been a likely nominee in 2000 if he could've |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elcondor
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 07:40 PM Response to Reply #26 |
45. You could be right about that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chaumont58
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 07:52 PM Response to Reply #26 |
47. Wow, the stuff that comes out of the far left |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-03 12:17 AM Response to Reply #11 |
55. I don't remember that they were both trying to unseat clinton in 96 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rose Siding
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:06 PM Response to Original message |
5. Gee. Dirt on Gore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onecitizen
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:07 PM Response to Original message |
6. Maybe you weren't aware of it........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scott Lee
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:08 PM Response to Original message |
8. Gore endorses Dean - let backstabbing begin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bombtrack
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:13 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. amazing you can accuse me of being in "in the former Gore adoring crowd" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scott Lee
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:55 PM Response to Reply #14 |
42. Try reading the post again. Sound out the words this time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sean Reynolds
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:09 PM Response to Original message |
9. Now let the anti-Gore/Dean posts fly! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Khephra
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:17 PM Response to Reply #9 |
18. Keep your head down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ibegurpard
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:18 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Couldn't get much worse than Saturday. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Khephra
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:22 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. Oh yes it could...and I don't even know how many we lost Sat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scott Lee
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:57 PM Response to Reply #24 |
43. Lose?? I was here on Saturday - what did I miss? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ibegurpard
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 07:42 PM Response to Reply #43 |
46. I don't know if we lost anyone on Saturday or not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adadem
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:39 PM Response to Reply #18 |
33. Right on the mark |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ibegurpard
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:09 PM Response to Original message |
12. Really Bombtrack you are taking this Dean animosity to an absurd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:15 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Yes, he is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:16 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. But it's doing a lot for his candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cocoa
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:21 PM Response to Original message |
21. Counterpunch smeared Paul Wellstone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
desi
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:21 PM Response to Original message |
22. I'm a newbie here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ibegurpard
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:23 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. Welcome to DU! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
desi
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:33 PM Response to Reply #25 |
31. Thanks ibegurpard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ibegurpard
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:36 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Great sentiments! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
desi
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:47 PM Response to Reply #32 |
36. Thanks again ibegurpard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:28 PM Response to Reply #22 |
29. Welcome to DU, and yes, you are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
desi
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:41 PM Response to Reply #29 |
34. Thanks Padraig18 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:51 PM Response to Reply #34 |
40. YW! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newyawker99
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 07:30 PM Response to Reply #34 |
44. Hi desi!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:26 PM Response to Original message |
27. The Horror... The Horror... LOL !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhosNext
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:27 PM Response to Original message |
28. I think Gore is doing this to position himself as a savior in '08 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:31 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. Savior to what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhosNext
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:45 PM Response to Reply #30 |
35. Sabotage? no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nothingshocksmeanymore
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:49 PM Response to Reply #28 |
37. Frankly, I think he is doing it to send a message to super delegates NOT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhosNext
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:51 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. Possibly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:50 PM Response to Original message |
38. As a Kerry supporter- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 06:55 PM Response to Original message |
41. Counterpunch Is Icky! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ozone_man
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 09:59 PM Response to Reply #41 |
54. Nice cards, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip Intro
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
48. No, no, no - not for a minute |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ComerPerro
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
49. Oh, come on, thats such FReeper logic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 08:03 PM Response to Original message |
50. "Gore Plotted"......Excuse me, here? Plotted? Conspiracy by Gore to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
51. Sour Grapes.......why not post this after the Gore Endorsement died down? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-03 09:42 PM Response to Original message |
53. stupidest articles I have read in a long time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Mar 13th 2025, 05:48 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC