Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Powell Adviser says Iraq war of choice after all ...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Samantha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 10:50 PM
Original message
Powell Adviser says Iraq war of choice after all ...
"Eight months after the Bush administration got us involved in a bloody war in Iraq, we are now told by one of Secretary of State Colin L. Powell's closest advisers that Iraq was a war of choice after all. According to Richard Haass, director of policy planning at the State Department until June 2003 and still the Bush administration's special envoy to Northern Ireland, the administration "did not have to go to war against Iraq, certainly not when we did. There were other options" . Really?"

more at

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A44381-2003Dec7.html

(an editorial, thus I am posting this in General Discussion).

Of course, we at DU have always known this, but it was rather startling to see it in print in today's Washington Post.

Comments?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Robin Hood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is this Powells way of diverting his lies?
Too little to late mother fucker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sigh. You know, I had forgotten about Powell for a moment. This doesn't
surprise me a bit. I wonder if he's going to vote dem
in the next election since its all ready been said he
won't be sec. of state if chumpy is re-selected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. I hate neocons
They are dangerous idiots who just don't give a fuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Samantha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. Aren't any of you surprised to actually see this remark in print
in today's Washington Post? I was amazed. One of Powell's closest advisors actually made this remark. Directly contradicts recent statements made by Bush* and Cheney as to the necessity of the war...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Well .... (heavy sigh) .........
it's such old news to us, I suppose .....

then there's the cynicism realizing that this won't see the light of day except for a few people who read the op-ed pages of the Wash Post .......

then there's the knowledge that these guys could be publicly dismembering children on live television and nobody but us would raise a stink about it ........

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Amazed? No. Not at all. This stuff is leaked in dribs and drabs
to help us get comfortable.

He used those horrible things on his own people! Yes, when?

WMDs? No problem! We know he had them--what, prior to 1991? Prior to 1998?




Going into Iraq was just a drip from a rusty kitchen faucet, one used after the failed *legitimate* defense in Afghanistan, to get us into some kind of crazed, anti-American, imperialist view of the world in Iraq and elsewhere. The American people are now drinking red-orange water and cleaning their toilets often.

I was dismayed and disgusted when I saw Powell before the U.N., and it was obvious that he did not enjoy what he was doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. I use this point all the time in chatrooms.
Necessary war vs. elective war. It's an important distinction to make. This was clearly an elective war, and in the middle of this "war on terror" one would think that we'd avoid starting wars that, as far as our interests go, don't need to be fought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 05:33 AM
Response to Original message
8. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC