Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clark campaigner promoting Hillary Clinton conspiracy theories

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
pruner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 11:02 PM
Original message
Clark campaigner promoting Hillary Clinton conspiracy theories
Edited on Mon Dec-08-03 11:26 PM by pruner
"One person close to General Clark suggested that Mr. Gore was supporting Dr. Dean in the calculation that Dr. Dean would lose to Mr. Bush in November, and that Mr. Gore would then enjoy the good will of Dean supporters "when he runs against Hillary Clinton in 2008."

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/09/politics/campaigns/09GORE.html?ex=1071550800&en=c95939efafc8cc1e&ei=5062&partner=GOOGLE

:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Mr. Gore's endorsement is suspect
for reasons of his timing... leave out other innuendo... that is enough... it is against democracy, as was counting only 2 florida counties... he's lost touch with democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. okayyeahsureright!
:eyes:

do you even know what the law was in florida about recounts? Gore did not have the legal option to call for a statewide recount unless bush agreed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. he could have called for it
It would have been the proper legal behaviour, as it put in question his entire jibe that democracy was his interest.

Why does the documentary film "http://unprecedented.org" conclude with a contrary position to your statement?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. or its all smoke. I don't put much stock with unnamed sources. its all
a bunch of crap until then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. What BS Spin by Adam at the NYT - "one person close to Clark"
One person close to General Clark suggested that Mr. Gore was supporting Dr. Dean in the calculation that Dr. Dean would lose to Mr. Bush in November, and that Mr. Gore would then enjoy the good will of Dean supporters "when he runs against Hillary Clinton in 2008."

then Adam goes on "General Clark, in an appearance on Monday evening on the MSNBC news program "Hardball With Chris Matthews," said he was unconcerned with Mr. Gore's decision. "I don't pay attention to endorsements, unless they are for me," he said."

and then Adam forgets Clark's comment that folks like Hillary are patriots who do things for their country and not in some twisted conspiracy to have an effect on 08.

God, what a media whore!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. gossip column politics
Al Gore's endorsement is news. Speculation by unnamed sources is gossip. Not particularly important in choosing a president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pruner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. agreed…
I know Dean's not your guy, but what are your thoughts about the Gore endorsement?

I haven't bothered to read through the 100+ post threads on the subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neuvocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. I guess Dean ain't your guy either.
You don't see Dean doing a smear job like what you're doing, based on right wing innuendo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julien Sorel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. This is a Pruner thread.
He has to find something to post to lay down astroturf for Dean at least a few times a day. Sometimes, well, often, he scrapes pretty low in the attempt. This was one of those times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bertrand Donating Member (764 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. you dont even know what the definition of "conspiracy theory" is
yet you promote an anti-clark thread based on it. Great job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. Reality avoidance 101
Politics sure brings out the best in people!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. another big
pile of shit from the new york times..donna,wow, that`s a good source and of course the "one person close" source. how did these idiots pass any journalism classes or do they just lie on thier apps?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eileen_d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. Just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water...
Edited on Mon Dec-08-03 11:24 PM by eileen_d
I sure wish all of these effing Clinton conspiracy theories would "jump the shark" :puke:

Edit: by the way, your thread title is bullshit; the articles says "one person close to Clark" -- that does not mean it is being actively promoted by his campaign. Not that I expect you to care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. uuuummm no
that is just silly. What good would backing a losing candidate do for him in 2008? That would be a very bad move and Gore just ain't that dumb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fairfaxvadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
14. as was mentioned over on Eschaton...
all the Washington Heathers are going nuts over this. No conspiracy, no Gore v. Clinton, it is what it is. Gore backed Dean. I'm sure his motives are pretty much the same as those on this board who are already on the Dean wagon and nothing more. He's gotta vote next year too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I think you're right.
The simple truth, stated simply. Thank you. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC