Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nixon thought Reagan was "strange"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Ficus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 01:50 PM
Original message
Nixon thought Reagan was "strange"
http://customwire.ap.org/dynamic/stories/N/NIXON_TAPES?SITE=IADES&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

<snip>

"Reagan is not one that wears well," Nixon said.

"I know," Haldeman agreed.

"On a personal basis, Rockefeller is a pretty nice guy," Nixon said. "Reagan on a personal basis, is terrible. He just isn't pleasant to be around."

"No, he isn't," Haldeman said.

"Maybe he's different with others," Nixon said.

"No," Haldeman said.

"No, he's just an uncomfortable man to be around," Nixon said, "strange."

<snip>

<snip>
Later, Nixon said Reagan's economic policies were unduly harsh and cautioned against giving him too much credit for winning the Cold War. "Communism would have collapsed anyway," he told Monica Crowley, a Nixon aide in his last years, according to her 1996 book, "Nixon Off the Record."
<snip>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. takes one to know one.
glad he recognized the cold war business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ficus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. My thoughts exactly
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abe Linkman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not very enlightening
Nixxon didn't say what he meant, so it's hard to know what to make of his comments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. Duuuuhhhhhhh?
That's about like Charlie Manson calling Ted Bundy strange!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. That's something...
Coming from a guy that would go to the beach in a business suit and wingtips.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ficus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. the most interesting part
Later, Nixon said Reagan's economic policies were unduly harsh and cautioned against giving him too much credit for winning the Cold War. "Communism would have collapsed anyway," he told Monica Crowley, a Nixon aide in his last years, according to her 1996 book, "Nixon Off the Record."

Was it jealousy, or did Nixon believe that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Nixon predicted it.

And pretty much the circumstances under which it would collapse. Detente may have made the peace crowd happy, but it wasn't about keeping the peace. It was about imploding communist states.

You can go back to Nixon's VP days and his Kitchen Debate with Kruschev. Nixon said communism would fail if the people living under communism knew what they were missing. This, however, flew in the face of the Churchillian national security policy of containment and starvation. Stalin did not lower that Iron Curtain, Churchill did and the US followed suit.

Once president Nixon replaced the starvation component of that policy with competition. Nixon "raised the curtain", Soviet citizens saw what they were missing, and THEY, not we, brought down their governments.

In the interim this infuriated LaRouchies and folks, like Reagan, in the John Birch Society. They thought Nixon was selling us out. LaRouche labelled our food shipments to the USSR, "tribute".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. Mae Brussell said Reagan was a BFEE set-up in 1972...
From a 1988 article by Paul Krassner:

In the summer of '72, Mae told me that the purpose of the assassinations was ultimately to get Ronald Reagan into office. Well, it happened, and the last time I talked to her, she said, "You know, more than half of the federal judges in this country were appointed by Reagan—and we know he didn't make those choices himself. That's how it happened in Nazi Germany—it was all done legally."

http://www.maebrussell.com/Mae%20Brussell%20Articles/Lee%20Harvey%20Oswald%20Meets%20Suzanne%20Somers.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catzies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. That's a damn good read Octafish. Thanks.
I never heard of Mae Brussell before I read that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ficus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. kick
for people who like to see Republicans talk shat about each other
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. Vindication!! I have been telling people that the USSR
was on the way out, and we knew it for decades.

What Reagan did, was short circuit Russia's efforts at reform, causing a decade of economic chaos, and now possibly a return of dictatorship.

At that to feed his massive ego.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC