|
Edited on Wed Dec-10-03 03:13 PM by webkev
Clark has plenty of experience... You don't need to know sh*t about politics to be in it, we all already know that. Bush never did anything in life but screw up in school, get in trouble with the law, own half a baseball team and become governor of the most 'stuck in the 19th century' state.
When your a president you're in charge of executive powers. The justice system enforces and mends the laws written by the legislative branch. Each three branches share an equal power. The president's executive powers make him in charge of diplomatic policies and the military. That's why they call him COMMMANDER-IN-CHIEF, the general of generals.
So why wouldn't a retired general fit the role of a great president? There is no reason why he wouldn't, and it appears that most Americans believe so. Which is why he is already the democratic frontrunner after Dean and beating Bush in popularity. Because we all know, even the few who once voted for Bush, that he screwed up very big in Iraq. And many of you regret giving him your vote
So what if Clark once supported Republicans? The two parties aren't bloodthirsty gangs that should hate each other! Sometimes... the Republican is the better candidate, and I'm a Democrat.
The point is, someone messed up our economy and foreign relations, now we need a man to replace him. We need someone who will apologize to other nations for Bush's erratic behavior, and mend our relations. Then we need a man to fix our job and economy problem. And finally we need a man who knows about the military. A man that knows that soldiers are not just expendable grunts... but everday people like you and me that don't deserve to die like this. And the military is used not for the offense, like the Nazis did.
So that's why Wesley Clark is still a frontrunner, and has my vote,,
|