Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Revisions: Economy Shrank Pre-Recession

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 06:11 PM
Original message
Revisions: Economy Shrank Pre-Recession
Edited on Wed Dec-10-03 06:15 PM by tritsofme
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. economy shrank in the third quarter of 2000, the government said on Wednesday in revisions to official figures that showed America was on the brink of recession months earlier than previously thought.


The sweeping changes by the Commerce Department also downgraded the expansion that followed the 2001 slump, albeit only slightly.

However, the revisions were not applied to third-quarter 2003 data -- leaving the most recent measure of growth unchanged at a swift annual clip of 8.2 percent. The next reading of third-quarter growth is scheduled for later in December.

Until now, statisticians at Commerce's Bureau of Economic Analysis believed the economy did not start shrinking until early 2001. But extensive revisions dating back to 1929, incorporating both improved statistics and changes to definitions, revealed a contraction in gross domestic product, or GDP, in the July-to-September quarter of 2000.

Instead of inching ahead at the first reported 0.6 percent annual rate in that quarter, GDP shrank 0.5 percent, Commerce said. The weaker estimate is mostly due to a larger drop in private inventories than previously reported.
(snip)
http://biz.yahoo.com/rb/031210/economy_growth_2.html

Is this still just bush* and his enron accountants trying to blame Clinton for the disastrous economy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT
Edited on Wed Dec-10-03 06:21 PM by Skittles
I am getting MIGHTY SICK of this republican government's revisionist history. They come back after THREE F***ING YEARS OF BUSH AND TELL US THIS???? BULLSHIT. BULLSHIT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
camero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. And here's the kicker
It's getting close to election time. Which means expect more revisionist history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarLeftRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. What she said!!!
Edited on Wed Dec-10-03 07:10 PM by FarLeftRage
I agree 100% here, this is simply Soviet-style revisionism at its'worst.

I remember that period of time, as well as many others here do and there was no proof of this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Soviet style is right - the GOP seems to love Commies
We're on our way to an authoritarian sweatshop country just like the old USSR and China. Thanks to Bush and the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. They even mess up the lie - leaving 4th qtr 2000 as expansion, so
recession did indeed start the middle of March 01.

and not under Clinton's watch.

Guess they did not want to challenge the folks that say when a recession starts and stops! :-)

Read the BS attached to explain - says in effect do not trust our numbers in the out years (they went back to 1929) - and that they moved money about based on "casualty insurance companies better allocated dates of loss". and indeed the changes were minor - just enough to claim Clinton had a down qtr from the Greenspan rate hikes - so it's not ALL Bush's tax cut's and tax cut pr's (that started in Dec 2000) fault! And forget Greenspan's testimony to Congress in Aug 01 that seemed to place start of problem on date Bush screamed out deficits do not matter - tax cut now - in Dec 2000.

Will the media catch on - or care?

our whore media?

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. i know skittles
is going to kick my ass- but there is some truth in that. i worked in the road building equiment industry and our orders started dropping off about this time. since the early 90`s the place was working 48+ hrs a week and then the orders were slowly tapering off in 2000 and really crashed in 2001. this industry feels the effects before other industries and recovers before others,but there is no upturn in business yet. the place i worked at has been owned by the same family for over a 100 years, so they have seen the economy rise and fall..the problem is now that screw heads in the government think their plans will work...and it ain`t going to. we are going to be fucked for along time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. bush took a weakening economy
and stomped it into the ground, where it remains to this day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-03 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
8. kick
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-03 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. kick
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC