|
The one you listed was taken from Dec 4-8 - the 8th being the day the news of Gore's endorsement leaked out. Comparing it with the next most recent poll, it would appear most of the support came from everybody except Lieberman, Sharpton & Braun. (Of course, there's no way of knowing what percentage of the 348 respondants were actually contacted on the 8th, but I guess we can assume a quarter per day over the four days.):
Quinnipiac University Poll. Dec. 4-8, 2003. N=384 Democratic voters nationwide. MoE ± 5. (I rearranged it to put the newest poll first, since that's how it is on the site):
Poll dates: 12/4-8, 10/23-27
Howard Dean: 22, 13 Joe Lieberman: 13, 13 Wesley Clark: 12, 17 Dick Gephardt: 9, 12 John Kerry: 8, 10 Al Sharpton: 8, 5 John Edwards: 5, 8 Carol Moseley Braun: 3, 3 Dennis Kucinich: 2, 3 Don't know: 18, 17
Also, look at the poll immediately beneath the one you listed, the CNN poll which ended on the 7th - the day before the announcement. It would appear that Lieberman, Kerry, Sharpton and Kunicich were losing support between Nov. and Dec, with Lieberman losing the most - so, did the "sympathy vote" influence the above poll, I wonder?
CNN/USA Today/Gallup Poll. Dec. 5-7, 2003. N=402 Democrats and Democratic leaners nationwide who are registered to vote. MoE ± 5.(Note, I rearranged them to appear in the same order):
Poll dates: 12/5-7, 11/14-16
Howard Dean: 25, 17 Joe Lieberman: 10, 13 Wesley Clark: 17, 17 Dick Gephardt: 14, 13 John Kerry: 7, 9 Al Sharpton: 3, 5 John Edward: 7, 6 Carol Moseley Braun: 5, 4 Dennis Kucinich: 2, 3 Other/None/No opinion: 10, 13
Anyway, just idle musings, in the long run. The next poll (post endorsement) will probably give a better picture of the "Gore effect" on the race.
|