Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who regrets the rise of Nazi Amerikka in 2000?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 10:21 AM
Original message
Who regrets the rise of Nazi Amerikka in 2000?
I do.

Sure wish that votes counted like the founding fathers intended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. Abolish the electoral college now!
This ain't 1787... Even with punchcard ballots, election results can be tabulated by precinct overnight. There's no need for this relic anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bitchkitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I wish - instant runoff voting too!
Both pipe dreams, I fear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. You're absolutely right.
The winner is the person who receives the most votes. How simple can this concept be?

Abolish the Electoral College immediately. All it does is to leave open the possiblity of more stolen elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. Like the founding fathers intended?
I hope you don't mean that part where the vote belongs only to land owning white males over 25 yrs old. Do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Touche
I meant the general principle. ALL men are created equal...yadda yadda...

I meant this post to be a response to the inane "do you regret the commies" posts.

I'm being a tad facetious you see.

I'd rather my other thread get kicked, http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=887624

I put some thought into that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. This Nation Has NEVER Been Equal and Never Will
The founding fathers purposely put the Electoral college in as a buffer between the rich and powerful and the "riff raff"...thus that a popular vote would not be the ultimate determinator of a Presidential election.

Some Constitutional scholars will argue that the SCOTUS usurption of the popular vote was exactly what the forefathers had in mind as they were overseeing and protecting the Executive. No, I think the SCOTUS overstepped its bounds in hopping into a state matter before it was legally exhausted in that state and told states that their voting rights are all but null and void to the whims of a runaway judiciary.

The Electoral College isn't going away, but it can be ammended to be more reflective of the popular vote. I have long suggested issuing electoral votes based on district, thus eliminating the winner-take-all game where someone can win all the electoral votes with a bare majority (which didn't happen in Florida anyway)...thus that if Candidate A were to win your congressional district, he/she win that electoral vote...the two senators are figured in afterwards...either both votes going with the majority of the states votes or split if that's the results.

Our forefathers trusted us as little as our current regime, the big difference is they put it on paper and in the open, and open to continual ammending and revision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. You're right
But there is that wording in the document.

"All men are created equal."

And i take "men" to mean "mankind" (in the context that Neil Armstrong used) - women are included.

The electoral college can be changed - they can never erase those words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC