Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I guess the Repukes got pissed when Bono swore on TV

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
La_Serpiente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 03:45 PM
Original message
I guess the Repukes got pissed when Bono swore on TV
Edited on Fri Dec-12-03 03:49 PM by La_Serpiente
H3687


H. R. 3687
To amend section 1464 of title 18, United States Code, to provide for the punishment of certain profane broadcasts, and for other purposes.


+++++++++++++++++ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES+++++++++++++++++

December 8, 2003
Mr. OSE (for himself and Mr. SMITH of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL
To amend section 1464 of title 18, United States Code, to provide for the punishment of certain profane broadcasts, and for other purposes.


Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 1464 of title 18, United States Code, is amended--

(1) by inserting `(a)' before `Whoever'; and

(2) by adding at the end the following:

`(b) As used in this section, the term `profane', used with respect to language, includes the words `shit', `piss', `fuck', `cunt', `asshole', and the phrases `cock sucker', `mother fucker', and `ass hole', compound use (including hyphenated compounds) of such words and phrases with each other or with other words or phrases, and other grammatical forms of such words and phrases (including verb, adjective, gerund, participle, and infinitive forms).'.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

So what do you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
UrbScotty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Those immoral Republicans want too much regulation!
LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. 500 Billion Debt, Failed Foreign Policy, Health Care System Crashing,...
...And the have time for this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. They forgot one
I thought "tits" was on that list, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrWeird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Shit, they edit out "nipples" nowadays.
As heard on Entertainment Tonight:

"The set of Three's Company was quite chilly and often Suzanne Sommer's ... were erect."

At least I hope it was "nipples."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Republicans love George Carlin!
It's "The 7 Dirty Words"! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La_Serpiente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. hmmmmm
Can you imagine if there was a debate on this bill in the House???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuminousX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I would pay to see that debate
The Honorable Senator from Oklahoma has the floor:

"Thank you. At this moment I'd like to yield thirty seconds to my honorable colleague from Nebraska."

"Thank you, I would like to see this amended to include the terms 'knobslobber', 'bearded clam', 'twat', and 'cornhole.'"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. LMFAO!!!!!
thx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuminousX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. Wow, they even took into consideration gerunds
What about 'penis wrinkle' can we still say 'penis wrinkle'? How about the term 'rim jobber' or 'salad tosser'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wow, they amended the Seven Dirty Words...
According to Carlin, the acknowledged expert on this subject, they used to be "shit, piss, fuck, cunt, cocksucker, motherfucker, tits".

So I guess 'tits' is now okay, and now Asshole is put in its place.

But hey, aren't they going to lock this thread, since there is profanity in the thread starting post?

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
montanacowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Isnt Asshole what *
called NYT reporter? tsk tsk those words are way too delicate for the tender ears of the repukes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Yup
Bigtime....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. "major-league asshole" to be exact
gotta include the hyphen :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ficus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. something like this:
"There's Adam Clymer -- major league asshole -- from the New York Times," Bush said.

"Yeah, big time," returned Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Jan 13th 2025, 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC