Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill O'Reilly beginning to turn on Bush re: Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
TheWebHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 01:28 PM
Original message
Bill O'Reilly beginning to turn on Bush re: Iraq
from his 'Talking Points' memo Friday.

video link:
http://www.foxnews.com/video2/player.html?5407&Talking_Points&Talking%20Points

Click the 'options' button...

Bush continues to 'muck up' Iraq post-war... Blasts DoD no contracts punishment... Newsweek finding UBL & Omar message courier but we can't find them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PSR40004 Donating Member (144 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. A ploy
To make him look independent....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDittie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. if you didn't believe anything he said before...
there's no reason to believe this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishnfla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. iraqi contracts
looks like the conswervatives are using this as wedge issue to get on the right side of the Iraqi situation, ours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Also going to get weary
of an open-ended stay in Iraq for our military. Just watch the true conservatives come out of the woodwork over this issue in the coming years. They will be the one's calling to "bring our troops home" evenmoreso that we libs are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadFaith Donating Member (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. Not necessarily...
Edited on Sat Dec-13-03 05:07 PM by BadFaith
We are, I think, in the beginnings of a split within the Republican party, and more specifically the conservative movement, that is going to be fought over the dominance of U.S. foreign policy and defense by their neo-conservative faction. Wolfowitz's memo, leaked a day before the President was scheduled to talk with world leaders about expanding the international role in Iraq, seriously undercut the administration's efforts to those effects. Given the insular nature of this administration, and its history with regard to press leaks, I am not of the opinion that this particular leak was accidental.

This situation has been brewing for some time, and started nine months ago when former Bush speechwriter David Frum, who authored the phrase "axis of evil", smeared so-called "anti-war" conservatives as unpatriotic in a NRO article. Many conservatives who did not entirely adopt the neo-conservative view on the then-pending Iraqi war were outraged over Frum's attempt to "out" any conservative who dared do partake of that contemptible practice of "not doing what you're told". Paleo-Conservative internet columnist Justin Raimondo did a piece on Frum back in March, calling the former speechwriter "Commissar Frum".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. I agree
because true conservatives -- not the neocons -- are at heart isolationist in nature, like Pat Buchanan.

We libs may get after them at times for not engaging the world in a healthful way (it more often comes out as anti-immigrant sounding), but this tendency of the conservatives to just stay at home at least winds up being a good, nonthreatening thing to the rest of the planet.

I'll have to go away for a few and read your article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishnfla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Well neocon/pnac architecht Wm Kristol came out this week
in the Weekly Standard specifically regarding these Iraqi contracts and full-out said the * policy was stupid. It was fun to see that. I'll go find that link now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadFaith Donating Member (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Don't Confuse the Ringleader with the Clown
While Bill Kristol's pull within the Neo-Conservative circle is significant, calling him the movement's architect is absurd. And PNAC is not so much the Neo-Con movement in its totality, but the most succinct expression of its ideals. Other purveyors of the Neo-Conservative agenda, with much more sway in American politics than PNAC can ever hope to achieve, include the Federalist Society and the Heritage Foundation.

No, if there was an architect of Neo-Conservatism, Kristol would not be it. Rather, the modern Neo-Conservative Movement finds its origins, principally, in such former-leftists (and radical ones at that) as Norman Podhoretz, Irving Kristol (father of William), and Jeanne Kirkpatrick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishnfla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. Ok then thanks
Edited on Sat Dec-13-03 10:39 PM by fishnfla
what are their views on the Iraqi conflicts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. Carter says Sr. Reagan and Bush officials privately saying Iraq was a
mistake.

http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0312/12/lkl.00.html

KING: Newt Gingrich, in a surprising statement over the weekend, said we've gone off the cliff -- off a cliff in post-war Iraq. And the White House has got to get a grip on this. Were you surprised at that criticism?

CARTER: I was surprised that Newt Gingrich said it, but privately, I have communicated with some of the former leaders in the Reagan administration, Bush Senior's administration, you know, who privately tell me it was a terrible mistake.

KING: Really?

CARTER: Oh, yes. And they are reluctant, obviously, to speak out. I was surprised that Newt Gingrich spoke out so clearly, but his voice is not alone among very conservative Republicans who feel the same way.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. When did Newt say this?
Anybody got a link on it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Here's a link containg the quote...
Edited on Sat Dec-13-03 02:28 PM by alg0912
U.S. Gone "Off a Cliff" In Iraq, Gingrich Says

<snip>
Former House speaker Newt Gingrich said yesterday that the Bush administration has gone "off a cliff" in postwar Iraq and that "the White House has to get a grip on this."

In a blunt critique by a leading Republican, Gingrich said the administration has failed "to put the Iraqis at the center of this equation. . . . The key to defeating the bad guys is having enough good guys who are Iraqis," he said on NBC's "Meet the Press."
<snip>

This coming from the biggest Neocon enabler of the 90's... :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. I believe it.
Party unity and loyalties are one thing, but real conservatives are not stupid.

I find it difficult to believe that many are not in great distress over the way the war is going, the complete breakdown in foreign relations, and the looming fiscal disasters. This is not good for anyone, and them least of all in many respects.

Methinks the cooler heads in the Republican Party are trying desperately to change the course of things. They're just not all that interested in hanging their dirty laundry out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
22. This is another reason Dean is gonna kick *'s ASS!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joefree1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hmm, I guess not all the neo-cons
got a Haliburton dividend check.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. The neo-cons do
to get Haliburton checks. Regular conservatives do not. This whole Iraq escapade is becoming a wedge issue withing the GOP. Just watch it grow.

I'm experiencing no small amount of schadenfreude over it. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. It's just bluster
He does that kind of thing from time to time to "prove that he's fair and balanced"..

Phony baloney..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Bluster is ok
Because his audience will remember. It plants a seed in their heads, and with us watering the seed day after day, it's bound to grow. From an acorn grows a mighty oak.

Besides, the truth, in any form, is a good thing. Even if it issues forth from a phoney baloney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. OReally: Celebrity Journalist
What's his opinion on Michael Jackson? Any new Hollywood gossip I should be aware of? SHUT UP! SHUT UP! SHUT UP! This guy is a "moran".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackSwift Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. What has changed his mind?
The facts on the ground haven't really changed. Has he just seen enough screwing up? Is it the war profiteering? The casulties? The cost?

All of these things are endemic in war.

But O'Reilly will be back to his usual crap the next show. Rupert Murdoch will fire him if he criticizes Bush in more than passing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
14. Throwing a crumb to the left. He won't go anywhere with this. (nt)
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
15. March 18 2003
"If the Americans go in and overthrow Saddam Hussein and it's clean, he has nothing, I will apologize to the nation, and I will not trust the Bush Administration again, all right?"

O'Reilly on ABC's Good Morning America

Is he getting a bit embarrassed at his previous support of Bush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Well, he should be!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Considering he made the statement without a gun to his head.

And where is the apology??

Nada. so don fall fo the HO.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #18
35. well,
Every time it gets brought up, he keeps pushing the deadline to find WMD back. I think he gave them a few weeks, then a month, then 2 months, then 90 days, then 6 months...

you get the idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Would be a good start.
If he stood by that quote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
littlejoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
17. Not to disrespect you, but
how can anyone waste their time watching Bill O'Reilly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasSissy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
21. Does anyone listen to "Bill O'Lielly" (as Franken calls him),
anymore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. I don't
but then again I don't have cable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BertrandL Donating Member (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #21
34. A lot of right wingers do, eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
27. Is this the same Bill O'Really
That blasted anyone who dare badmouth Bush?

Pot, meet kettle. Glad to meet ya!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
28. He also said "How is it that Newsweek can find Osama but we can't"
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
29. If O'Reilly starts bashing Bush - Bush could be in deep do-do
I'm going to write him and telll him to keep up the Bush-bashing - much as I can't stand the guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
30. O'Reilly also bashed Bush on how he's not liked overseas/wants to tax rich
Agreed with the decision to remove Judge Roy Moore.

wtf!!! The world as we know it has ended...

OK - he still has a lot of the same goofy opinions but he seems to have become a little more reasonable.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,105448,00.html
Talking Points admires accountability, but admires vision as well. President Bush is not well liked overseas. That's not good for us. He should stick to his principles, but also embrace policies that will improve America's image abroad. Payback is sometimes justified, but it's not only the wisest thing to do.

And that's The Memo.


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,104683,00.html
Finally, Talking Points has a solution to the whole government spending mess. Every new entitlement should be funded by a national sales tax on everything except food and clothing under $100. Talk about taxing the rich -- those Mercedes-buying, yacht-sailing fat cats would pay their full share without slippery corporate deductions.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrdmk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
32. Just a question
Did Bill O’Reilly say he would eat something by a certain date if no weapons of mass destruction were not found in Iraq?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-03 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
33. That may be but it won't matter.
Newt Gingrich criticized bush on the Iraq war too but he was on Washington Journal about a week ago and he was still spewing the party line and praising bush.

Don't let these right wing mouthpieces fool you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC