|
I'm no political expert
I mean no disrespect when I say this, but it's clear you're not an expert. You're looking only at facts and only at one side of the arguement about those facts. If you want a sense of how strong the president's reelection chances are, you need to get outside of hte DU echo chamber and listen to people talking about where the economy is going to be in 9 months, how the war is going to appear to be winding down by October, and what Karl Rove is gonna do to smear our candidate in the campaign.
This fight will be ugly, uphill, and only close if we do everything right.
but even I could write a campaign script that would eat him alive.
Then I strongly suggest that you do just that. Write it in letter form. Then send the letter to your local paper, ask to read it before any groups you belong to, and generally work your ass off between now and November.
Now your answers:
Economy - 3 million more people out of work; dollar tanking; trickle down, etc.
The economy is our stongest ally, but most voters don't judge based on the past 4 years, they vote based on the past 12 months. The economy probably will be better this fall than it is now. Most indicators suggest that serious hiring growth will begin in the first quarter of 2004. The weak dollar is disturbing, but in the long run it will actually help reduce our trade deficit (also increasing under Bush).
Twain once said there are lies, there are damned lies, and then there are statistics. In a debate there's as many ways for the GOP to spin the numbers positively as there is for us to show the problems. If people are personally feeling the pinch in their pocket book, they're not going to be very receptive to Dr. Dean's suggestion that we repeal the middle class tax cut. It's a crappy message from our front runner and one that's bound to hurt us with working class moderates.
War in Iraq - total failure; weapons of mass fabrication
Eh? What's that about weapons? The media has already quit talking about this. And by November there will be numerous events (troop pull outs, inauguration of a civilian Iraqi government, hand over ceremonies, and probably the capture/killing of Saddam Hussein) timed to make Iraq look like a bid success AND yesterday's news.
For Karl Rove, job #1 is to kill Iraq as a campaign issue.
War in Afganistan - total failure; warlords back in charge fighting with renewed Taliban for control
The public generally supports the effort in Afghanistan. They did house OBL, after all. I think people will be generally accepting of troubles coming from a non-optional conflict.
Crony capitalism - Halliburton, Enron, etc. one could have a field day with this one.
Budget Deficit - out of control
These will be buried by the corporate press. As long as the economy is picking up, swing voters won't give a crap about such matters.
Medicare - rape and pillage
Medicare is a tactical plus for Bush, actually. He can run for reelection claiming that he "fixed" the problem. This is one traditional Democratic issue where we've been solidly trumped. Only the AARP folks know how badly elders have been screwed on this, and the AARP leadership has been co-opted by Bush's bandwagon effect.
Environment - Kyoto treaty Global relations - we are now the laughing stock of the world
Sadly, these are not voting issues for the preponderance of the electorate. It sucks, certainly, but no one cares.
Patriot Act - assault on the Constitution 9-11 - stonewalling Energy task force - stonewalling Plamegate - stonewalling
Lord, you make me want these clowns gone. Make this part of your speech. I can only say that after 9/11 people are willing to put up with a lot of crap from an administration so long as they feel like the president's a decent guy they can trust. He's managed to keep that up even when his adminstration is in shambles.
Three years of nonstop screw ups, mismanagement, and cronyism, and he's still pulling down 50%+ approval ratings. Any normal human would be in the 30s by now. He & Rove are marketing geniuses. There's been no major corruption investigations, no major resignations, no major scandals (thanks to the press's lap dog impression), and precedent shattering unity among Congressional Republicans.
Call them bastards, but don't call them politically inept.
Education - this was the education president (what a joke) Great Uniter - We are more divided as a nation than ever War on Terror - where the hell is the money for anti terrorism programs?
Again, you are right on subtsance and naive on facade. These are all excellent talking points. Having heard both Wes Clark and Howard Dean go after the president on these points, I can tell you that we are on the verge of nominating a guy who can't sell these arguments to moderate Democrats--the "go along" people in our party who intrinsically dislike confrontation and divisiveness.
Dean won't win any arguments on the Uniter issue because (Catch 22 time) he has to be explicitly divisive to point this out. He automatically loses credibility when he addresses this issue head on. Now all Bush's mouthpieces on talk radio have to do is sigh plaintively and say "Hey, Bush wants to be a uniter, but these liberal Democrats are trying to tear us apart. Listen to what Governor Dean says..."
I want us to win. But we need to win over a lot of swing voters who are eager to support who ever will make them feel safe--even if it's "the devil they know." The last thing we need to do is try and convince ourselves that this will be an easy fight. I think we all get the picture!
|