Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The War Against Workers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 12:42 PM
Original message
The War Against Workers
http://www.aflcio.org/aboutunions/voiceatwork/employerwar.cfm

When workers seek to form a union—whether at a construction site or in an office, hospital or manufacturing plant—their bosses almost always will obstruct their efforts through threats and harassment. Some employers even fire workers for trying to form unions, which is against the law.

Cornell University scholar Kate Bronfenbrenner studied hundreds of organizing campaigns. In her report Uneasy Terrain: The Impact of Capital Mobility on Workers, Wages and Union Organizing, she found:

* Ninety-two percent of private employers, when faced with employees who want to join together in a union, force employees to attend closed-door meetings to hear anti-union propaganda; 80 percent require supervisors to attend training sessions on attacking unions; and 78 percent require that supervisors deliver anti-union messages to workers they oversee.
* Seventy-five percent hire outside consultants to run anti-union campaigns, often based on mass psychology and distorting the law.
* Half of employers threaten to shut down if employees join together in a union.
* In 25 percent of organizing campaigns, employers illegally fire workers because they want to form a union.
* Even after workers successfully form a union, in one-third of the instances, employers never negotiate a contract.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. I applaud your efforts
on behalf on unions and American workers, WCTV. You and I might disagree on candidates, but you keep your eye on the ball- helping workers. But I think your posts will be lost today in all the handwringing about how Hussein's capture means Shrub wins in 2004 or how it at least kills Dean's campaign.

These are the real issues for our voters, though. I only wish that we could continue to focus on ways to help the middle/working class and poor. Instead, we're too focused on Corporate America's War for Oil and the Catch of the Really, Really Bad Man- just like businesses want us to be.

No wonder we keep losing elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. thanks
I'll be at home working today, so I'm just going to keep kicking this every once in a while when I need a break. I'm wondering what the job picture will be like in the next few months. If there's an uptick in employment, the "growth" we've had will maybe help, so far it hasn't. A bunch of scary layoff/outsourcing stories in the next few months could bring us back to talking about the economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bad day for substantive comments on real economic issues.
Didn't you get the memo? That Uni-Bomber guy was caught in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. doesn't matter
As you said in another thread, the Walmartization of America is continuing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. Kick!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dawn Donating Member (876 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. I disagree with some of the others....this is a great time to bring it up
While everyone else is talking about catching a guy who did horrible things halfway around the world, the workers in this country are being exploited. I think the Dems should focus on this more, instead of always trying to play catch up with Bush on foreign policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I was just being sarcastic. Frankly there's little else more important....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dawn Donating Member (876 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. :) Ok, I'm slow today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Welcome to DU
A belated welcome anyway!

I was being rather facetious in my comments- sorry. I've been saying for months exactly what you just posted. No Dem, no matter what their resume or military experience is, can beat Shrub on national security/war on terra issues. He is perceived to be too strong on those issues by most Americans. We can only tie him by pointing out the problems which still remain.

However, we could absolutely crush him on domestic/economic issues, but instead, we continue to choose to play by the repubs' script. I just don't understand it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
10. Unions are in decline right now but if
bush would win another term Id bet my asscheeks that they will come back with a vengeance. You only have to kick someone once to make them understand what the agenda is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redleg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
11. Who cares? We caught Saddam!
Just some tongue-in-cheek stuff. I appreciate the info you provided. This is a trend I have noticed as well. Union avoidance activities by employers, including unfair labor practices, have been on the rise, especially with the return of a republican to the WHite House. Those employers know damn well they are violating the NLRA (and amendments) but they persist in their behaviors and get rewarded for it when the union fails to get certified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC