Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Poll: Bush's Approval up 4 Points on Capture/Reelect Down

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-03 09:19 AM
Original message
Poll: Bush's Approval up 4 Points on Capture/Reelect Down
Edited on Mon Dec-15-03 09:25 AM by HFishbine
Here's tha big bounce everybody was in a tizzy over, Bush's job approval is now at 57%, up 4 points from the previous week. Dissaproval is down 1 point to 39%.

Other tidbits:

Planning to vote to reelect Bush: 45% (versus 48% previous week)

Worth going to war: 62% (versus 59% previous week.)

http://www.pollingreport.com/BushJob.htm

and

http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/12/14/sprj.nirq.saddam.poll/index.html

(on edit: added reelect numbers)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-03 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Remember folks
Poppy was polling 90% at one time, and look what happened.

Saddam's capture will mean squat if we are still struggling in Iraq, unemployed and struggling economically.

Plus, the classic Bush personality will expose itself come general election. Like father, like son. What really did Bush I in was the fact that he was seen as uncaring and aloof compared to the outgoing, personable Clinton.

I still say there is a chance. But lots of work needs to be done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-03 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. There's a big difference.....
This admin is far more sneaky and victory driven than his fathers was. They are more willing to pull out all the stops and do what needs to be done to win. And the country is far more polarized than it was back then. Besides the first Iraq war was not seen as personal or in response to anything that directly impacted Americans. It simply does not make sense to discount the post 9/11 effect and manipulability of the American public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudnclear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-03 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. Most people know that if Bush is elected for another term will be at war
with another nation within weeks of his swearing in. It the entire Bush cabal that the voters will be voting against...PNAC and all. That's what the message should be from our candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-03 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. This is an important point. I am always surprised, and disappointed,
that there is not a bigger reaction whenever someone in the Bush administration refers to the next pre-emptive war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CMT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-03 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. unfortunately we have to give it a week to sink in
and let the pundits do all their whoring to get the real feel of where his approval is going. I think the bounce will be there, but probably not as much as he hopes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-03 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. i don't think the post capture numbers are as problematic
as the pre-capture numbers. i think the precapture numbers of those who support the war are pretty hard and it concerns me that the front runner is telling those people they were wrong instead of focasing on how bush fucked up/saying bush was wrong.

telling people "support me because i think you are wrong" isn't a good strategy imho.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-03 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
6. Some Statistical Analytics
Remember that the polls are +/- 3%. (Almost all of them.)

A four point change is only 66.666% of the confidence interval.

So, there is, at the very least, a 1 in 3 chance that the change is within the confidence interval, meaning there is no change at all. Therefore, there's only a 2 in 3 chance that this is any change whatsoever.

In addition, there would be only an 2.5% chance that the actual change was the full, statistically relevant 4%. IOW, it is possible that we consumed 2 of the 3% confidence interval, and then added only 2%. It could be 3 and 1, or 1 and 3, etc. So, there's only a 1 in 40 chance that the change was really 4%.

Of course, it won't be reported that way, but that's how the math works.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-03 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Thanks for the analysis
Excellent point. Thanks for digging into the numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-03 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. nice post
We need more people like you who remind us of the laws of statistics when it comes to interpreting polls.

Astronomers have a notoriously bad grasp of statistical issues, but I try to do what I can.

Thanks, Professor!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-03 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. Any Time You Need Help, Feel Free
I'm nuts about astrophysics, so i can pretend to know what you're talking about and you can pretend to know what i'm talking about. A nice synergistic relationship, indeed.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-03 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
8. Wow. That's not much of a bounce at all!
I was expecting 10 points or so.

But FOUR?

The American people are a lot smarter than the pundits who try and predict what they're going to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozone_man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-03 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
9. He drops in re-elect 3%.
That's the more important number. This war bounce is a speed bump along our way to steam roll Bush in '04.

The Bush I Iraq war I popularity sure didn't help him escape voter's wrath over the joblessness back than.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-03 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
11. Now that Saddam is caught
Channelling Conventional Wisdom:

The public may associate him with his father's failure.
He cleaned up his daddy's mess, but he's making a mess out of the country with his draconian domestic policies.
He seems removed and aloof from the common man.
People are starting to get that he's a global elitist and a belligerent militarist.
So, he's done his job. Saddam's gone.
People, after 9-11, have had their violent catharsis.
Now, let's get a Democrat in there to repair international relations and get the economy working for the middle class again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-03 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Bush might still need DIEBOLD
If the polls continue this way an effective Dem candidate who can express a positive message may start to appeal to the swing voter tired of fear and anxiety and wanting a message of hope for the future.

And if the Diebold scam is exposed he might need LIHOP II.

Saddam's capture might propel the average American to want a speedy withdrawal from Iraq. But Bush and Cheney want a long occupation to shore up their oil business there.

Troubled times remain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-03 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Or maybe people are finally beginning to tire of WAR--
The military trip was fun for awhile, we all got to wave our flags and watch the military hardware on TV.

But the body count continues to rise. The soldiers aren't as fun to watch anymore...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozone_man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-03 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. The war weariness is setting in
and that is not good for a Democracy, unless there is a darned good reason for it. Bush has not provided one.

People want an end to this war and their attention will now refocus on the failing economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Granite Donating Member (195 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-03 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Who are these people who wildly flip-flop
Edited on Mon Dec-15-03 11:32 AM by Granite
in their opinions of Bush? Granted I'm a straight-ticket partisan, but when called on these polls I always answer the same way - disapprove, unfavorable, no reelect, etc. Who wakes up one day and says, "gee we got Saddam - i like Bush now, even though I hated him yesterday?" Pretty scary when you think about it - people who are that influenced by current events and not the overall gestalt of an administration's policy directions. Ugh.

But we've recovered from all of his other bumps - 9/11, the pulling down of the Saddam statue, the landing on the aircraft carrier, killing Uday & Quesay, and the Thanksgiving turkey - we'll recover from this one too when people begin to realize that its all PR and photo-ops and no substance.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-03 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
18. Kick
for the afternoon crowd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Jan 13th 2025, 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC