Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I cannot get this timeline out of my head.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 12:19 AM
Original message
I cannot get this timeline out of my head.
Perhaps, because it is so damn short:

Baker, the consigliere of the BFEE, is called in to bail out the asses of those foreign policy amateurs in the maladministration.

Literally days later, up pops the bogey man from his hobbit hole, meekly surrendering, with all the charisma of someone who sleeps in a cardboard box on a subway grate.

Question: Did Baker get in there, discover that Rove had Saddam on ice, and jerk the chain on the idea to keep him on ice until closer to the election?

What say you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gmoney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. Baker wouldn't do anything to taint GWB's election chances...
Edited on Tue Dec-16-03 12:28 AM by gmoney
Check out Greg Palast's recent article: Baker Takes The Loaf

http://www.gregpalast.com/detail.cfm?artid=300&row=0
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. 'bush administration's conflicts are us appointments'
a great line
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
economic justice Donating Member (776 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. What say me?
I say you give Karl Rove wayyyy too much power! So many people would have to be involved in such a DANGEROUS conspiracy. This tin foil stuff ("Karl Rove had him on ice") makes DU look like a very weird and immature place IN MY opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. No.
I give him just enough credence. And the power he wields.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eccho Donating Member (139 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. It is a bit paranoid, but hard not to consider.
Are you forgetting how the hostages in Iran were kept an extra month so that they could be released at Reagan's inaugeration? The source on that was Jimmy Carter (not exactly a radical figure). I agree it's very easy to get a bit paranoid, but what can you do when nothing seems beyond their hunger for power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
economic justice Donating Member (776 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Carter NEVER believed that <eom>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eccho Donating Member (139 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Um, I am saying that Carter said that.
Anyone have LexisNexis to look it up? It was something he claimed many years afterward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Hell...
I heard the hostage flight announce their takeoff from teheran Airport, on the Strategic Air Command 11243/11246Mhz frequency, AS Reagan had his hand in the air, taking the oath.

And people wonder why I consider these possibilities...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. I say the army found Saddam
and that the army has been getting better info from Iraqis lately, because the Iraqis want to stop the guerilla attacks so that the U.S. will leave their country.

I say the army had been narrowing the area of a search for Saddam over the course of months now.

I say that it's more important to note that Baker was charged with fixing the neo-con mess in Iraq and Wolfowitz immediately tried to undercut Baker's mission with our traditional allies by noting that none of them would get any chance to bid on the big contracts.

With this in mind, no doubt if Baker had discovered that Saddam was on ice, Rove would not have listened to him, if what Baker said did not coincide with Rover's plan for the Bush re-election armada, and I say that Baker would have had no ammo against that because he's not going to undermine Bush's election chances.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. I say Baker outranks Rove. When Junior has to call in

il consigliere, he knows he has to follow his advice. Baker has bailed out Bush butts too many times to be ignored.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
10. Nah, I'm buying this one
Sorry.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
12. No, it took the military all this time to translate this sentence:
"we will give you twenty five million bucks if you tell us where Hussein is hiding"

into Arabic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC