Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A good outcome of Saddam's capture!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Pontus Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 03:47 PM
Original message
A good outcome of Saddam's capture!
http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2003580992,00.html

Apparently he was directing attacks on our troops and we can now hope that witht he arrest of many of his top leaders the attacks will decrease.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Unfortunately
he was NOT DIRECTING the attacks this comes from one of the Generals, Odierno

And unfortunately the Ba'ath party is not the only one involved in the attacks

You will see this morph into something similar to what the Brits faced after the great revolt of 1920 as the Nationalist and the Wahabis take hold
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozola Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. I read he was setting up a spam server.
Edited on Tue Dec-16-03 03:51 PM by Bozola

Our troops will be able to rest easy now knowing that that George W. Bush has denied them mail order viagra offers.

Honest!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. nice propaganda...we shall see
For our troops sake, I hope it is true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. I hope the attacks do stop...bring home the troops...save some lives
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KFC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. That is good news
Anything that decreases the attacks is a positive development.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. From CNN
http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/12/16/sprj.irq.main/index.html

"Dempsey said that while Saddam apparently was not directing the attacks on coalition forces, some insurgents did report to him "on the chance that some day he might be able to once again be their patron."...

However, a senior official in Washington said the arrests were "not high-level people but cell members further down," adding that some information has been "actionable" intelligence that may save the lives of U.S. soldiers.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petrock2004 Donating Member (182 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. the sun is a tabloid paper
i think saddam and osama are gay lovers too, and martians are directing the insurgency. ;-)

and sorry if that was too harsh, i just try not to trust the tabloids too often. maybe i'm wrong this time though. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. Britian's "The Sun" is little more than a daily "The Enquirer"
Most of its readers buy it more for sports and the ever popular Page 3 Girl. Today's a saucy Manchester lass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thehonesttruth Donating Member (85 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. back off
i love my page 3 girls
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Military Brat Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
9. Murdoch owns The Sun, exclusive interview to bush, remember?
Does anyone remember that bush gave an exclusive interview with The Sun when he visited England? Yes, the very same one with the naked lady on Page 3.

Murdoch is a RW shill with more money than, well, God. The Sun is a RW echo chamber.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
10. YES
HE WAS DIRECTING ATTACKS FROM A HOLE IN THE GROUND WITH NO ELECTRONICS. YES INDEED.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pontus Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. And the videos since the US coalition invasion...
He had access to video production, so he had access to more than worms in his little hole!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. So did he have a beard in the video?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleDannySlowhorse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. His psychic powers are formidable
He could also bend spoons with his mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
15. locked
please review the rules for posting a new thread in GD before posting a new thread in GD.

Thanks

1. The subject line of a discussion thread must accurately reflect the actual content of the message.

2. The subject line of a discussion thread and the entire text of the message which starts the thread may not include profanity, excessive capitalization, or excessive punctuation. Inflammatory rhetoric should also be avoided.

3. If you post an article or other published content which is from a conservative source or which expresses a traditionally conservative viewpoint, you must state your opinion about the piece and/or the issues it raises.

4. If you wish to start a vanity thread (ie: a discussion thread in which the sole purpose is to share your personal opinion) you must state your opinion in a non-inflammatory manner which respects differences in opinion and facilitates actual discussion.

5. You may not start a new discussion thread in order to continue a current or recent flame war from another thread. The moderators have the authority to lock threads in order to contain flaming on a particular topic to only one thread at a time.
 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC