If the United States backed Iraq when they 'gassed the Kurds'....

[Sean Reynolds]

I know some here believe that it was in fact Iran that gassed the Kurds. But lets just play like it was Iraq for this moment. When Iraq 'gassed the Kurds' they were being backed by the United States, correct? Well, does that not mean we're guilty by association? So when Bush hypes up the gassing to justify the attack; shouldn't Bush be attacking the terrorist state known as America? Remember, Bush said he'd go after any terrorist state, or any state that was helping terrorists. Well during that time we were helping Iraq, thus WE were helping terrorists.

Mr. Bush is Mr. Hypocrite!

[Nicholas D Wolfwood]

1. psh,

Saying Bush is a hypocrite is like saying the sun will rise in the east.

[ComerPerro]

2. Well, thats just the beginning.

If he were truly intersted in going after those who sponsor and support terror, why in the world is Jim Baker defending Saudi Arabia against Americans citizens in a lawsuit filed by families of 9/11 victims?

[Old and In the Way]

3. Perhaps Dimson will bring Poppy up on charges of enabling

terrorism.

But I guarantee if it had been a Democrat who had done this shit, we'd have it drilled into our collective sub-conscious by now.

First Noreiga, now Saddam. Republicans are going to have a real hard time finding RW tyrants to do their bidding if this is the thanks that they get for promoting illegal and anti-democratic actions in their countries.

[number6]

4. means Rummy should go to Jail

..

[forgethell]

5. What should we do

to those nasty Americans? bomb DC? Could we do anything worse than installing * as President?

[killbotfactory]

6. Can the US be held responsible for supporting Saddam while..

he was committing war crimes?