If the Democratic nominee has a BIG lead over AWOLBush

[Hoppin_Mad]

Poll question: If the Democratic nominee has a BIG lead over AWOLBush

If the Democratic nominee has a BIG lead over AWOLBush going into the general election, and it looks like a definite win for the Democratic party, what is the most likely scenario to happen, in order to guarantee the BFEE stays in power ?

[VT70]

1. Conspiracy theories are fun.

Really.

[Ladyhawk]

6. I think that Bush made such a mess the GOP will win in 2008.

If a Dem wins, the fuckup is so massive, the Dems will be blamed and we'll have Bush or a worse croney back in the White House in 2008. I think this nation is going down and it makes me physically sick to think about it.

[Ladyhawk]

7. Incidentally, I totally disagree with your Lieberman quote.

Read this little book to find out why. And this only covers atrocities propogated by Christians.

Religion leads to divisiveness, not to unity. Look out the window.

Now I know why I don't like Lieberman. :)

[tom_paine]

2. Busheviks dare not be so bold

The sleep of the Imperial Subjects is still very light, and they could be easily awakened if the Imperials go too far or are too obvious.

While arranging a plane crash for a prominent Senator or candidate is acceptable, you can't go to the well too many times otherwise the Imperial Subjects might awake, so probaly there is won't be another Bushevik enemy plane crashed for awhile.

But whacking a pResidential candidate, though the Busheviks could get away with just about anything, I don't think they'd risk it.

Not when the Manual Disenfranchisement and Vote Stuffing plans from 2000, combined with the electronic fraud of 2002, is right there and has shown itself to be quite sufficient with half the risk of waking the sheep.

Plus, the Party-Loyal Right-Wing Sub-Media and the Corporate TV Pravda that dances to it's tune will ensure that the race will be close enough to steal...

[AntiCoup2K4]

3. They are fully capable of any of the above, but only the terra attack.....

...would rationalize their use of martial law, as Tommy Franks himself has suggested in the event of another terrorist attack.

And since previous reports from the Fraudministration have indicated that a "Red Alert/martial law" situation would require you to stay in your home and obey a curfew, going out to vote wouldn't be "safe", so the election would be cancelled "by emergency decree".

[fob]

4. One slight correction...

I think the question should read;

When the Democratic nominee has a BIG lead over AWOLBush going into the general election, and it looks like a definite win for the Democratic party, what is the most likely scenario to happen, in order to guarantee the BFEE stays in power ?

On Edit,

And you need to add some bombshell Donna Rice on the lap of said Dem nominee stuff, whether true or not, from rove/cheney smear machine.

[Hoppin_Mad]

5. I think it will be a 'small lead'

[Wetzelbill]

8. I refuse to vote......l'm scared it will come true

[Wetzelbill]

9. In the poll! I'll vote in the election ::whew::

[Kremer]

10. I've asked before and I didn't get an answer?

Maybe I'm ignorant or behind the times but what does BFEE stand for? Thanks.

[Hoppin_Mad]

12. BFEE = Bush Family Evil Empire ( or Enterprise )

[Kremer]

13. Thank you.

[Hoppin_Mad]

14. You're welcome

[OKNancy]

11. About the terror attack

I've seen a lot of people on DU speculate that it would be an advantage to Bush, but I think just the opposite. It would be the very worst thing that could happen to him. He can't keep us safe!!
( and a few candidates could say, I told you so)