Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ex-Navy Secreatary brings skepticism to 9/11 panel.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Dimsdale Donating Member (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 10:40 AM
Original message
Ex-Navy Secreatary brings skepticism to 9/11 panel.
Edited on Mon Dec-22-03 10:45 AM by Dimsdale
This piece on John Lehman was printed as a front page item today. Have I missed something? Lehman job in all this will be to join in to limit how far up the panel will go to assign blame for 9/11. CIA, FBI, fair game. BushCo. NFW.

Note the "heads on pikes" term below. This is making the rounds just as "pay to play" did during the Cal. recall.

http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/front/7546164.htm


snip

A member of one of Philadelphia's oldest families and an acolyte of former President Ronald Reagan, Lehman was named Navy secretary in 1981 at 38, one of the youngest in U.S. history. Like Reagan, Lehman believed the American military had become too passive. He wanted to shake things up and was skeptical of government bureaucracies, particularly intelligence-gathering agencies.

Time after time, Lehman said, he had seen the CIA get it wrong, misreading tactics of the Vietnamese army and the Viet Cong and failing to grasp the scope of the Soviet naval buildup. By the time Lehman left the Navy in 1987, he had presided over a huge buildup of U.S. naval forces and put in place a leadership team that endorsed Reagan's aim of pressuring the Soviet Union militarily.

snip

"Certainly in the largest intelligence failure and greatest attack on civilians in this country's history, there were things that went wrong. There needs to be an accounting of what went wrong," he said.


Yet Lehman adds quickly that he is not interested in putting heads on pikes.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Smokie Donating Member (44 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Head on a Pike?
The idea is that no one is gonna pay? Is that what their "Plan" is?

When you begin to ponder just how far this has gone, with all the stops the Whitehouse could throw in the way -- one by one being run over, you'd think they have something better than "head on a pike."

They are sweating bullets. Let's keep the heat turned up. Let's demand at least one head on a pike. Just one little ol head. Just one Colonel or Commander, or section head. Just give us one on a pike, we'll take the rest on a platter.

Somone needs to pay for this intelligence failure, and pay now. We need the first... the rest will be sure to follow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC