If you could only pick one which would it be?

[Bandit]

Rush Limbaugh doing hard time for a minimum of ten years or Bush* losing in 2004. It is a really really hard choice for me. I think Rush is probably more dangerous than Bush*. Without rush Bush* would never have been elected in the first place. I would vote for Rush going to prison.

[mikehiggins]

1. Get rid of Bush

If Clark gets into office he can secretly declare Rush an enemy combatant and ship him off to Guantanamo. No one will ever know what happened to him. God bless the Patriot Act!

Karma, karma, karma, karma, karma chameleon...

[oostevo]

2. Yeah, but ...

While Bush is a murderous, unelected ruler who endangers the world, Rush did something that no one should go to jail for (the drug use, not the other stuff), and is only a danger to himself.

[LuminousX]

5. I fully agree with this, drug addiction is a disease, not a crime

[Bandit]

7. I was not concerned with any particular crime

I agree nobody should go to jail for drugs but I'm also sure Rush is a Felon in many many ways and just hasn't been caught. My question does not say what crime he should be jailed for only if you would like to see him behind bars for ten years or so. Rush is indeed a danger to America and unless you don't believe in the power of Propaganda I find it hard to understand how you can say he is no danger.

[Cleita]

3. How about Bush doing life for war crimes in a cell with

Limbaugh doing time for drugs. Two birds. One stone?

[Individualist]

4. That's my choice as well n/t

[citizen snips]

6. Good question.

That is a hard one I cannot pick one.:shrug:

[SlavesandBulldozers]

8. Are you kidding me

watching Rush being dragged through the media-mill is just as entertaining as watching him dragged off in shackles. He's had his wings clipped.

We need a new President, moreso than pigboy in prison. Although what a day it would be to have both. Now if we can just find a tape of Shawn Hannity at a Turkish bath. . . .

[Crunchy Frog]

9. I'd pick *Bush losing in 2004

Unfortunately there's plenty more where Rush came from. The only real solution to the Rush problem is to break up the media monopolies so that other points of view actually have a voice that ordinary people can access. I hope that this is an issue that a Dem president would try to address.

[West Coast Democrat]

10. Bush* Losing in 2004

no contest

[Beaker]

11. Rush would be replaced by Sean Hannity-

so what would be the gain?
Having Bush lose, and then get to listen to rush's arteries bulge for the next 8-12 years over President Clark and his successor would be a real treat. I'd proabably even tune in once in a while.