Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Convince me there won't be a Christmas Day LIHOP or MIHOP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-03 09:34 PM
Original message
Convince me there won't be a Christmas Day LIHOP or MIHOP
OK, so I'm a professional journalist, and I normally take all these terror alerts and generalized panics mostly in stride. But tonight, on a Christmas Eve when I'm working as usual, I'm almost at my tipping point.

Chimpy and his minions have succeeding in terrifying me. But it's probably not for the reasons they'd like. What knocked me off the deep end? An Associated Press report that circulated late this afternoon with the headline "U.S. braces for terrorism attack."

Why on earth would anyone be "bracing" for an attack -- in much the same way that one "braces" for a hurricane -- unless there were some type of knowledge that such an attack was indeed imminent?

I'm now extremely worried that our PNAC cabal is going to either allow or cause an attack on Christmas Day. It's affecting how I work tonight, and I don't like that one bit at all.

So, fellow DUers, I turn to you. Despite all the panic (duct tape mania all over again) and all the hype, I ask you for arguments, evidence, or just plain reassurance. Tell me that there won't be a LIHOP or MIHOP in the United States tomorrow.

(Of course, if you're instead thinking like I am right now, feel free to chime in as well.)

My poor stomach, blood pressurem, and nerves are off the scale right now. And I've got a paper to get out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-03 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. It would make more sense strategically for them to PREVENT an attack
It would make more sense strategically for them to PREVENT an attack.

If they let one happen, then they would have let one happen. It would be hard to blame on the supposed inaction of the previous administration this time.

On the other hand, if there are "credible" warnings and they stop a few planes from Paris or some such, then they stopped it. Woo-hoo. They are heroes.

No, if an attack happens, it will be a real attack that they tried to stop and couldn't. There would be no percentage in LIHOP or MIHOP this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-03 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. agreed. and that's exactly what they're doing now.
they can come out with the most outrageous story they can make up now. And who's to tell them that they're lying? We don't know.

They can claim to have stopped the most heinous attack of all time. The press will buy it, and we'll be spoon fed the story.

That's probably what this is all about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-03 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. That's a good point
Edited on Wed Dec-24-03 09:51 PM by Newsjock
... and a possible sign of hope.

We can let them brag about how evil Air France was stopped today -- and hope that, within a couple of weeks, the real story will emerge, whatever it is.

Of course, the Washington Post will dutifully publish a Dana Milbank expose that will document the administration's lies, it will be buried on Page A29, and it will be forgotten by the next day.

Just like how the last orange alert was apparently started by non-credible "intelligence," as ABC uncovered. We don't hear much about that anymore, either.

On edit: I note that Josh Marshall is already reporting this:
Meanwhile the DC correspondent of a major French media outlet tells me that French authorities looked at the list of names provided by the Americans and eventually concluded on their own that the people in question had no ties to terrorism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-03 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Besides, they're keeping you at work and ten bucks says the camera
Edited on Wed Dec-24-03 09:58 PM by nothingshocksmeanymo
crews are there to film it so they can use it as campaign adds.

The film will star Arnold and Bush since we know they are targetting California (go figure, film...California...bad actor for bad governor *gosh I've heard this before*) Arnold will get caught in a jam as the TERMINATOR, Chimp will show up in a flight suit to save him with his stuffed sausage, the Democratic mayor of the city of LA will look like a doofus while Chief Bratton carries him away from the threat, Arnold attempts to terminate a terrorist, accidentally kills a tourist at the airport...Bush is there to save him and......can you see it now?

The Terminator and the Chimp.... starring in TOTAL REGURGE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scimmio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-03 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. Arnold knows how to share a marquee
Giuliani didn't take too well to any of that co-billing, screen-sharing business. Arnold has experience sharing the credit a little and having a co-star in the limelight with him. Here I was worrying about us folk out on the East Coast and wondering why France would fly over just to attack the West Coast. An Arnold/George feature presentation would make for some fine news clips. Heck, FOX could ride it 24-7 with only occasional breaks to update football scores. I'll let myself feel safe now, here in the DC area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blackcat77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-03 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
21. I agree completely
And they managed to finger the Usual Suspect as well. "Darned French -- we're always having to clean up their messes!" This whole thing is very, very convenient -- it looks very dramatic with cancelled flights and all and so if nothing happens, that translates to a big win for them. Also notice the complaining about the "making public of the cancelled flights." As if they could keep stuff like that secret! That gave them the excuse for not actually catching any bad guys.

It's just too perfect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-03 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
28. And what holiday
memories to we "keep in mind"? I remember Christmas memories. This way no one will forget next election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scimmio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-03 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. will PREVENT but be unable to specify...
for security reasons of course.
now, I kind of figure the more dangerous time would be next October/Halloween...a major attack/accident around then could make the suspension of elections seem like a safety measure...would be hard to vote if we actually went to Code RED levels and curfews/travel restrictions were put into place...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sibanetta Donating Member (60 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-03 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Huh?
What are LIHOPS & MIHOPS?


Sibanetta
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-03 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. The theory...
that certain people in the administration either let or made the 9/11 attacks happen for political gain (Let It Happen On Purpose and Made It Happen On Purpose).

Personally, I don't subscribe to either of these views. I believe they just TAOTS (took advantage of the situation).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-03 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. LIHOP, MIHOP
Let It, or Make It, Happen on Purpose

Used to describe how some people view the White House role in the Sept. 11 attacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-03 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
33. I'll bet a thousand bucks there will be no terrorist attacks today or
within the next 10 years, launched against the USA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
number6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-03 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. News Years ... MIHOP...
:nuke: nothing tomorrow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-03 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. I agree that it will happen on the New Year if it does.
I have no inside information, just an informed gut feeling. Christmas would be a bad holiday to LIHOP or MIHOP, what with all those right wing Christians supporting BFEE, but New Years is a holy day only to Catholics and a few other orthodox Christian churches and not a big one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattNC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-03 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. i'm nervous too
but i still dont expect an attack on the homeland - abroad is a different story. i think you may just be reading too much into that one headline though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-03 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. relax
Even if something happens, the odds of you or someone you love being affected by it are very very slight.

That's the bottom line.

Terrorism is now just one more way to buy the farm.

You're probably more likely to get hit by lightning or bitten by a poisonous spider than you are to die from a terrorist attack.

I live in LA, by the way (Santa Monica). I'm not worried because, well, I figure it's so completely out of my control that, well, what the heck am I supposed to do? I'm more scared of a drunk driver on the PCH than I am of a terrorist blowing me up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-03 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Buying the farm
Oh, I don't realistically expect to perish in a blaze of al-Qaidaness.

Rather, since I'm in "the biz," each one of these attacks, panics, or scares makes my work all the more difficult. Top editors go into their own panic (they're worked up over mad cow right now just as much as they did over anthrax, and it's impossible to talk rationally with them), and of course there's the added space to fill without the added people.

More importantly, however, I deeply worry that any attack anywhere in the U.S. will essentially, as Tommy Franks warned, gut what's left of our Constitution. And that's the vision of a United States that scares the living crap out of me.

Sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-03 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. LMAO - "and it's impossible to talk rationally with them"
just the off and way you put it..oh my...ha ha ha...tears running down my face...

tell me, do any of these news-bots ever stop and consider the bigger picture, the course of history, the fullness of time?

how do you put up with it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-03 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. The newsbots
tell me, do any of these news-bots ever stop and consider the bigger picture, the course of history, the fullness of time?

Of course they don't. They're in their own state of perpetual fear, scared out of their gourd that the corporate bigwigs will demote their butts down to the paper in Lower Dungville.

And with our circulation plummeting the way it is, it's a miracle that such a thing hasn't already happened.

I'd say more, but I don't want to give any hints as to the actual newspaper company for which I work. That would be a very bad thing indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-03 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. indeed
I still pine for the old days, before cnn was subverted by the cia, before the reign of terror that black and murdoch went on with heavy financial backing from unclear sources, and now the carlyle group is to move in and save hollinger while acquiring other weak strays...

my local paper was devastated by hollinger...

'tis but a shell of its former glory...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JailForBush Donating Member (753 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-03 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think it's quite likely that the Republicans will stage (another?)
terrorist attack sometime between now and next November. However, it doesn't really frighten me directly, because I'm protected by the law of averages; they probably won't attack every city in the U.S.

On the other hand, I fear the following events - like martial law or increased assaults against our civil liberties - very much.

On a philosophical note, every day's another terrorist attack with Repubilcans and Vichy Democrats in charge. From outsourced jobs to mad cow disease, where does it end?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-03 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. It would ruin George's vacation...
January 11

I can't tell you I know for sure, I just keep hearing certain Psy Ops types referencing 1-11 alot. as in the time 1:11 or a date 1-11. 11-1? those three numbers, anyway.

just a nagging feeling at my back...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthseeker1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-03 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
16. A thwarted (orchestrated) attack....tip from Saddam
Edited on Wed Dec-24-03 09:59 PM by truthseeker1
My theory is:
There will be a thwarted (orchestrated) attack and the resulting effect they are hoping for is that everyone will feel safer because Homeland Security was able to thwart the attack.

But here's the kicker: THEY WILL ANNOUNCE THEY GOT THE TIP FROM THEIR INTERROGATION OF SADDAM, finally "proving" the link of SH to the terrorists, and thus getting their justification for the invasion.

It will be a two-for-one. People will conclude that the invasion was justified and that Homeland Security has been doing a good job. Bush's numbers will go up.

Make that a three-fer - they will also "prove" Dean has been wrong about his assertion that SH's capture has not done anything to make us safer.

On edit: btw, what's a LIHOP and MIHOP? Obviously a terrorist attack, from the context, but what do those acronyms stand for? Please excuse my ignorance!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-03 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. LIHOP=Let It Happen On Purpose
MIHOP=Made It Happen On Purpose
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-03 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
19. Guessing (correctly) when the next terror event is to take place
is about as easy (and makes as much sense) as timing the market. You can't do it. So have fun tomorrow. Fugettaboutit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-03 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Profits Of Death...
one could monitor any extraordinary movements in the stock market as regarding "put" options...

http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/12_06_01_death_profits_pt1.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-03 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
24. FEAR of an attack is just as effective as an attack itself...
Edited on Wed Dec-24-03 10:43 PM by Q
...if the end goal is to keep Americans afraid of their shadow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-03 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. This is what they are doing and playing on it.
The fact is, how close is an attack to the majority of Americans? It's not very close. I have to admit that when our earthquake struck on Monday, I had some real fear that the nearby nuke plant had been hit. Being incommunicado for hours after didn't help. However, it was a common variety rather big earthquake, compliments of mother nature. I hope most Americans realize that a terrorist attack will hit a spectacular target that is meant to scare the shit out of everyone, not anything that will change our way of life. What is changing our way of life are the jerks that are supposed to be governing us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-03 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #24
31. fear is the goal
and it's not coming from Osama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-03 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
26. Not now, but soon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-03 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
29. Not now, perhaps on 4/11.
911 was meant as an emergency call against American hegemony, which failed since Bush used it to increase world hegemony. They also don't want to fight Christmas the same as Christians don't want to fight Jewish holidays. Why would Christians fight Passover, then celebrate Christ celebrating, er, um, Passover. The anger over world trading hegemony caused a hit on the "World Trade Center," our military, and possibly our military ruler/CEO Bush. The next hit, information only 411, or the new 711 for non-emergency calls would be aimed at something miltary, e.g. the Pentagon again, and secondarily political, e.g. federal buildings, probably the capital dome.

So, it failed, it's the wrong time, and the wrong place.

The only worry I see are small renegade zealots who have little backing and would try things like shoe bombs. The kind of things it takes a lot of investigators to uncover.

Thank goodness the FBI no longer spends our money investigating Clinton for partisan purposes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-03 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
30. 1:30...nothing yet
er...well, as far as I know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-03 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. relax
Edited on Thu Dec-25-03 01:36 PM by RBHam
the palestinians and israelis are filling the death quota today...

IDF clamps full closure on territories after suicide attack
http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/spages/376094.html

5 Palestinians killed in Gaza strike
http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/spages/375991.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-03 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
34. I definitely feel a "setup" in the air
they are going overboard trying to terrify us and I shudder to wonder what it is. What's gonna happen, and when, I have no freaking idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC