|
Some woman was just reporing on Mad Cow. She was giving the rundown on how the infected cow was found, but you had to listen closely to hear her bullshit. Kinda pun intended. The explained how downed cows are cows that are too old, sick or injured, and are therefore sent to slaughter. Because they are downed, they all get inspected for disease and such. Okay, fine, right? Except then she explains that this particular cow was "injured while giving birth" and therefore they didn't suspect mad cow, and sent her off to slaughter, even though they had not received test results back yet.
So how the hell is this a safeguard? If the supposed policy is to test downed animals, do they really have a clause that says "only if they want to?" This was clearly a downed animal. CNN explained the policy that downed animals all get tested, and that once they found out the cow had the disease, "the system of check and balances went into play, and they were able to track the infected animal." So...they test the animal, then process it and ship it out into the food supply ANYWAY, before even getting results back?
And this CNN bimbo is applauding them and the "system of checks and balances" that allowed them to track this so quickly. But...but...am I missing something?
Oh, wait. It appears that I may be...
They seque into the next segment. An economy segment. And how this Mad Cow thing could be a huge disaster to the been industry, and they were checking to see how far prices had already fallen.
Obviously, the series of checks and balances was not really working at all, or the cow would not have been processed. But leave it to CNN to paint a happy face on all of this, about our great inspectors protecting us...there must be another Bush poll they're doing...
|