Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

130 Soldiers from Arlington Honor Guard sent to Iraq means DRAFT is next

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-03 12:48 AM
Original message
130 Soldiers from Arlington Honor Guard sent to Iraq means DRAFT is next
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/07/international/worldspecial3/07CND-GORDON.html?ex=1073019600&en=8df3c53a5ddfad45&ei=5070

-snip -

The United States Army's Old Guard is best known for its ceremonial duties. Its soldiers stand vigil at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldiers at Arlington National Cemetery and serve in color guards for visiting dignitaries...

...The Old Guard, formally the Third Infantry Regiment, will not say where its contingent of 130 or so soldiers is going, but Pentagon officials say the current plan is to send B Company to Djibouti, the tiny East African nation strategically situated on the Horn of Africa, across the strait from Yemen, and a location where the United States has established a base to respond to terrorist threats.

...But make no mistake, the American military commitment to Iraq and Afghanistan for the next year is still enormous and putting considerable strains on the armed forces. The boots on the ground are a visible sign of the Bush administration's commitment in Iraq and, as President Bush vowed, to plant the seeds of Democracy in the Middle East. Pentagon officials say that the military can handle the burden for another year.

-snip-

A major worry for the Army is also that a third year of large-scale deployments in Iraq will make it difficult to retain the noncommissioned officers and experienced reserves that are needed for a quality volunteer force. Reserves will account for more than a third of the troops deployed in Iraq next year. Retention is a lagging indicator, but the anecdotal indications from reservists in Iraq is that some will leave the military at the first opportunity if they conclude that it entails regular yearlong tours away from home.

-snip-

Bush '04 = DRAFT '05
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BayCityProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-03 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. I don't even want to think about a draft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-03 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. You don't have to--until April 1, 2005
Edited on Wed Dec-31-03 12:54 AM by Dems Will Win
http://www.sss.gov/perfplan_fy2004.html

Reduces draft activation time to 75 days by March 31, 2005, conveniently after the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q3JR4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-03 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. Wouldn't it require
an act of congress to reinstate the draft? Short of another September 11 occurance, does anybody see that happening?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-03 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yes and on April 1, 2005, I'm predicting Bush will say "we're not going
to cut and run from Iraq, DoD says it needs the DRAFT" Wouldn't need an attack with that line to get Frist and Delay to agree. Besides he has no choice, even the DoD admits they only have enough soldiers for another year in this very article!

Remember the 2004 Plan by SSS to reduce activation time down to 75 days by March 31, 2005.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC