The Bush administration has been battling the Pentagon/career military, the CIA, fiscal conservatives, and non-interventionists for a long time. Kerry has years of foreign policy credibility, and everyone knows he's a combat veteran and everyone from Rumsfeld to Wiliam Bennett is not-
http://www.deal-with-it.org/general/military_service.htm. A lot of Republicans are alienated, and Kerry isn't saying he is going to make America unrecognizable to them. This kind of thing has probably been posted here a lot before, but this magazine really shows how unhappy a lot of longtime Republicans are, and how different their views are from the neoconservatives not to mention the Christian right-
http://www.amconmag.com/archive.html. It's a trove of ammo for use in conversations with conservatives. Why not make your case in their and their people's words? A lot of Republicans don't care much about human rights being violated in far-off countries, but they aren't too wild about "Big Government" drafting their kids to fight for a secretive foreign policy they don't understand. You've seen Will Pitt talking about how Pat Buchanan should do another Presidential run! In some ways, at least when he does those doomed third-party runs, he's their Nader, and he's been at it for a while, it doesn't seem to be some phase! I think this election is a perfect time for the Democrats to pick up some maybe one-time voters, as long as the Democrats don't come off as rude, unrealistic and out-of-touch. I mean maybe we can pick up Republicans who are fairly realistic themselves, I'm not saying spend tons of time trying to convert people who make political decisions with "The End times" in mind, hardcore anti-abortion types, etc., but let's see who's out there. The Plame story is great for converting your local Tom Clancy reader: treason's treason, right? If someone says "It's God's preparation for the millennial Armageddon", well, what can you do, move on to the lucid.