|
Edited on Mon Jan-05-04 01:17 PM by RandomKoolzip
There have been a lot of "Tinfoil" threads lately, with much volleying of ideas and much bandying about of terms such as "wacko," "discredit," etc.
What I notice, and this has been a hallmark of the mainstream (soft) left for about a decade, is that there are speculators, and there are police. One person notices an anomaly, speculates on its circumstances, and draws conclusions. Another notices this theory proceeding from speculative thought, and polices the speculator: "you have no proof," "You will make us look bad," etc.
Often the police compare reasonable speculation about more mundane topics with wild-eyed and drooling phenonmena such as UFOs, mind control, Tesla death rays and the like. They do this in order to make the speculators appear less than sane, when really it is a bulwark of sanity and intelligence to be curious, to theorize, to generate ideas, regardless of empirical proof. To state that there must be no speculation on phenomena without empirical data defining the existence of said phenomena is deny the natural drift of Western thought- countless ineventions invented, countelss murders solved, countless problems turned into benefits all owe their existence to dedicated thinkers noticing an anomaly and then engaging in speculation, from where proof often proceeds.
What is really the kicker here is that I do not see the soft right indulging themselves in policing. Recently I've had the displeasure of trolling many right-wing websites and much conservative literature, and come across very few examples of right-wingers policing fellow right-wing speculators. One right-winger speculates that Hillary Clinton is a murdering lesbian, an idea for which there is no empirical proof, and the others nod in agreement. There is no sustained cry of "You're making us look like rightist wackos!" or accusations of leftist infiltration. Lots of "dittoes," or "Ping!"s, but no attempts to discredit.
Implicitly, the message is that all the conspiracies, I suppose, have proceeded from the left. Not true; witness the numerous projects to smear FDR by speculating that he "let" Pearl Harbor happen, the wild claims about the Clintons, the John Birch paranoia, McCarthyism (which really was just a conspiracy theory gone haywire), Nixon's enemies list, etc. Rarely does a voice from the conservative wildeness cry out in shame that these hairy theories are undermining the right's stand on the issues. Have you ever heard of a freeper or rightie scold a fellow righie for climing without proof that the "gubmint" is trying to take away his guns? Where is the proof that there is an organized effort on the part of the Federal Government to repeal the second amendment? Nowhere. It is a figment of the collective conservative mind, and yet the theory is allowed to roam with abandon in the playing fields of the right.
Why is this?
On DU, I've seen sober, reasoned speculation occur concerning the circumstances surrounding the election theft of 2000, the murder of JFK, RFK, MLK, Wellstone, etc. and every time, a policeman's voice steps in and in the interest of preventing "us" from losing face, denies any attempt to make sense of events, which in their current unsloved state reamain mysterious and vague. Right-wing gun nuts are allowed to push into the mainstream with their paranoid fantasies of armed militias defending their right to bear arms, and the soft right applauds their "rugged individuality."
Let's face it, people, the right now is in control. Whether or not there is empirical proof of their wrongdoing which we can use to combat them, the mere fact that we EXIST at all is an affront to them. They will use anything and everything at their disposal to crush our party, all the while convincing the middle, the independents, and the undecideds that we are evil incarnate. Are we really so afraid of rocking the boat that we cannot allow ourselves the freedom to notice and speculate? Even if there were reams and reams of data stating definitely that Bushco killed Wellstone and LIHOPped 9/11, the right would still despise us. It doesn't matter if our image is that of wild-haired conspiracy wackos, or that of tweedy professors calling for wealth redistribution, or that of well-groomed Republican-lite moderates. In other words, what do we have to lose?The right will ALWAYS call for our doom, whether we're wearing tinfoil or not.
Maybe what's wrong here is not that we have quite a few among us specualting on conspiracies, but that we lack the conviction of our "wacko" beliefs. This conviction can be contagious; once you've brought up the vagaries surrounding 9/11, there's no getting the cat back in the bag. How many people still believe Oswald did it? Word of mouth on this subject has turned public opinion around dramatically in forty years. Maybe we can use our specualtive thought to our advantage. After all, the right never lost ground with voters when exploiting Birchian anti-communist hysteria or gun nuttery for their own political ends. Maybe it would be in our favor to continue speculating out loud about how the right has gotten away with so much murder, mayhem, and destruction over the years. Look at where the self-policing approach has gotten us so far!
Anyhow, that's my 2 cents. Now....flame away!
|
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
