Forum Lightbulb Joke

[itsnoteasybeingreen]

Not sure if this has been posted before, but I got a good laugh..

How many forum members does it take to change a lightbulb?

1- to change the light bulb and to post that the light bulb has been changed
14- to share similar experiences of changing light bulbs and how the light bulb could have been changed differently
7- to caution about the dangers of changing light bulbs
1- to move it to the Lighting section
2- to argue then move it to the Electricals section
7- to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts about changing light bulbs
5- to flame the spell checkers
3- to correct spelling/grammar flames
6- to argue over whether it's "lightbulb" or "light bulb" ... another 6 to condemn those 6 as stupid
2- industry professionals to inform the group that the proper term is "lamp"
15- know-it-alls who claim they were in the industry, and that "light bulb" is perfectly correct
19- to post that this forum is not about light bulbs and to please take this discussion to a lightbulb forum
11- to defend the posting to this forum saying that we all use light bulbs and therefore the posts are relevant to this forum
36- to debate which method of changing light bulbs is superior, where to buy the best light bulbs, what brand of light bulbs work best for this technique and what brands are faulty
7- to post URL's where one can see examples of different light bulbs
4- to post that the URL's were posted incorrectly and then post the corrected URL's
3- to post about links they found from the URL's that are relevant to this group which makes light bulbs relevant to this group
13- to link all posts to date, quote them in their entirety including all headers and signatures, and add "Me too"
5- to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot handle the light bulb controversy
4- to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?"
13- to say "do a Google search on light bulbs before posting questions about light bulbs"
17 - to say they have the best brand lightbulb and accuse the rest of being fanboys
1- forum lurker to respond to the original post 6 months from now and start it all over again.

[TheDebbieDee]

1. I'm in total agreement with your post, EasyBeingGreen : -- )

[jeff30997]

2. lol!

[CaptainClark23]

3. doing my part

"Not sure if this has been posted before, but I got a good laugh..

How many forum members does it take to change a lightbulb?

1- to change the light bulb and to post that the light bulb has been changed
14- to share similar experiences of changing light bulbs and how the light bulb could have been changed differently
7- to caution about the dangers of changing light bulbs
1- to move it to the Lighting section
2- to argue then move it to the Electricals section
7- to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts about changing light bulbs
5- to flame the spell checkers
3- to correct spelling/grammar flames
6- to argue over whether it's "lightbulb" or "light bulb" ... another 6 to condemn those 6 as stupid
2- industry professionals to inform the group that the proper term is "lamp"
15- know-it-alls who claim they were in the industry, and that "light bulb" is perfectly correct
19- to post that this forum is not about light bulbs and to please take this discussion to a lightbulb forum
11- to defend the posting to this forum saying that we all use light bulbs and therefore the posts are relevant to this forum
36- to debate which method of changing light bulbs is superior, where to buy the best light bulbs, what brand of light bulbs work best for this technique and what brands are faulty
7- to post URL's where one can see examples of different light bulbs
4- to post that the URL's were posted incorrectly and then post the corrected URL's
3- to post about links they found from the URL's that are relevant to this group which makes light bulbs relevant to this group
13- to link all posts to date, quote them in their entirety including all headers and signatures, and add "Me too"
5- to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot handle the light bulb controversy
4- to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?"
13- to say "do a Google search on light bulbs before posting questions about light bulbs"
17 - to say they have the best brand lightbulb and accuse the rest of being fanboys
1- forum lurker to respond to the original post 6 months from now and start it all over again.

NO WAR BUT THE CLASS WAR"


Me too!

[TrogL]

4. Didn't we have this six months ago?

I'm sorry, I can't resist.

[Zero Gravitas]

5. How many members of the Bush Administration

does it take to change a light bulb?

None, they'll just deny the light bulb has burnt out (and if it did it wasn't their fault)

or

300

6 to praise Bush's tough stance on the War Against Burnt Out Light Bulbs.
2 to try and make the French pay for the new light bulb.
4 to call the French names when they refuse.
1 to write a memo claiming it is OK steal a new light bulb.
3 to cover up the existence of the memo.
18 to smear anyone who a) says that the light bulb has burnt out b) claim that maybe the French have a point, c) mention the existence of the memo or d) point out the Bush is responsible for burning the bulb out by repeatedly flicking the light on and off.
250 to draw the up the invasion plans for Iran and/or Syria and/or the Sudetenland and/or France to uncover their giant stockpiles of light bulbs.
16 to draw up a sweetheart contract where by Halliburton is contracted to change the light bulb at a cost of $900,000,000 to the Tax Payer.