Bush: No Proof of Saddam Role in 9-11

[Chuckup]

Gee, I'm shocked and awwed.

WASHINGTON - President Bush (news - web sites) said Wednesday there was no evidence that Saddam Hussein (news - web sites) was involved in the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001 — disputing an impression that critics say the administration tried to foster to justify the war against Iraq (news - web sites).

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=544&ncid=703&e=1&u=/ap/20030918/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush_saddam

[Wonder_Cow]

1. barf icon!

wherefore art thou!


ah, here we go:

:puke:

[Rhiannon12866]

2. We all know what he said and how many times he said it

And most Americans now believe it, 70% to be specific. I heard this earlier tonight on the news and Keith Olbermann was just interviewing a guy from U.S. News and World Report who said that Bush* is backtracking to ``reconstitute his credibility,'' looking at the 2004 election.:grr:

I had a thread on this in Editorials that didn't get much attention, either. Same topic, different article. I guess everybody here is aware of what's going on with Bush* and Cheney's ever-changing lies. The problem is how to inform the general American populace!:shrug:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=103&topic_id=9743

[Rhiannon12866]

3. He needs to inform Dick Cheney of this...

Cheney was still making the Saddam-9/11 connection just last Sunday!:crazy: