|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge |
Goldom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-04 10:01 PM Original message |
Why won't (x^2)^.5 differentiate right?!!!!! (need..help...) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ediacara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-04 10:02 PM Response to Original message |
1. Calculus = Mathematical Masturbation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billyskank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-04 04:03 PM Response to Reply #1 |
24. !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-04 10:03 PM Response to Original message |
2. The square root of x squared...isn't that just x? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
s-cubed (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-04 10:10 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. No, the square root of x^2 is the absolute value of x |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-04 10:12 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Yeah, you're right, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-04 10:05 PM Response to Original message |
3. y=x |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goldom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-04 10:08 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. But square root of x^2 is the absolute value of x |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-04 10:09 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Yes, that's right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-04 10:14 PM Response to Reply #6 |
14. Yes, true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalBadger (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-04 10:18 PM Response to Reply #6 |
16. split the domain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billyskank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-04 04:09 PM Response to Reply #6 |
25. Look at it this way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kellanved (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-04 10:06 PM Response to Original message |
4. 1? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-04 10:09 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Yeah, I think this is different, for some reason... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kellanved (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-04 10:13 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. has been some time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalBadger (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-04 10:19 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kellanved (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-04 05:31 AM Response to Reply #18 |
22. language issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billyskank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-04 04:11 PM Response to Reply #18 |
26. Not *piecewise* continuous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sympleesmshn (460 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-04 10:07 PM Response to Original message |
5. i think it is right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
s-cubed (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-04 10:14 PM Response to Reply #5 |
13. since it's abs of x, you get -1 for x < 0 and +1 for x>0, and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
barackmyworld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-04 04:14 PM Response to Reply #13 |
27. correct--here is how I remember the chain rule |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalBadger (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-04 10:12 PM Response to Original message |
10. You got it...just simplify |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catch22Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-04 10:18 PM Response to Reply #10 |
17. Hey welcome to DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalBadger (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-04 10:21 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. thanks! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gristy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-04 10:16 PM Response to Original message |
15. seems mostly right to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-04 10:24 PM Response to Original message |
20. True calculus comes from pencil and paper, not from an infernal machine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MikeDuffy (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-05-04 11:00 PM Response to Original message |
21. dy/dx = -1 (x less than 0) , =+1 (x greater than 0) and undefined at x=0 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
s-cubed (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-04 03:35 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. interesting set of posts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Classic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-06-04 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
28. As noted by others on this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Jan 20th 2025, 06:42 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC