the Who and the Beatles

[yorgatron]

would this make sense to anybody else? the Who are missing the bass player and drummer (RIP Kieth Moon and John Entwhistle) and the only Beatles left (RIP John Lennon and George Harrison) are the bass player and drummer.sounds like a good combo to me.

[commander bunnypants]

1. I would go for it in a heartbeat

but I fear it would not happen


DDQM

[kmla]

2. Hmmmm. Call them "The Who-tles"

Could sell a bunch of albums. But not to me. I'm afraid time has passed them by.

:P

[Demobrat]

3. That would never happen.

It wouldn't be all about McCartney. There's no chance.

[Gato Moteado]

4. i like the idea......

......but i'd rather see elvis costello and eric clapton team up with paul and ringo.

nobody could ever replace george and john, though.

[DBoon]

5. Oasis back up McCartney????

More likely IMHO

[yorgatron]

7. i think it would work best

if they only did new material.the Who have been getting by for far too long only playing their more popular songs,and McCartney's best work was never his solo material.

[bif]

6. Total contrast in musical styles

Doesn't work for me. Would never work for them. Sorry.

[BigMcLargehuge]

8. the kids are alright in strawberry fields...

I like it.. but only if they play Who songs.

[hiphopnation]

9. Cripes!

sounds like a crust-a-thon. Why not throw in Mick Jagger and Davy Jones :hurts:

Man we need some new entertainers!