Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Was Gene Roddenberry a conservative libertarian?!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 06:21 PM
Original message
Was Gene Roddenberry a conservative libertarian?!
I actually READ that on a website dissing Rick Berman's vision of Trek and it disturbed me.

Are there websites which say what Roddenberry really was and where he stood on issues? (I do know it was Gene Coon who came up with the multi-ethnic bridge crew, though Roddenberry knew that 1960s society would barely accept a female 2nd-in-command, which was why #1 wasn't the captain in the pilot "The Cage"...)

I think Roddenberry was a liberal and Rick Berman, for the most part, nicely expanded on his ideologies.

But I'm just a fan. What's the truth?

Oh, where can I get the Next Generation DVD sets for reasonable prices; $100 per set is too much?

Thx!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hmmm, let's see...
Roddenberry's idea of the future of humanity: no capitalism, hell no money, everyone's needs are fulfilled, women & men of all races serving together as peers...

Yeah, that's a conservative libertarian's dream. Uh huh. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anti_shrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Not to mention
Kirk and Uhura having the first on screen interracial kiss. Doesn't strike me as coming from a conservative-impaired mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Kirk did it with Aliens
one shot he's kissing an alien babe and the next shot he's zipping up his pants...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. LOL!
Actually, he was putting his boot back on, not zipping up his pants - which, for 1968 childrens' TV was as bad as showing XXX-rated gay porno.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
16. Velcro
No zippers in the 23rd century
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Well
TOS, half the time, said they had outgrown money.

Unfortunately, the other half the time they did make references to money.

The Kirk movie era, namely Trek IV, did definitely imply that money was a thing of the past (though we all know Roddenberry was kept out of the loop for the movies, especially after he leaked Spock's death to the public during the making of Trek II).

For this aspect I'm not yet convinced.

But I agree with you fully on the other points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anti_shrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Next Generation made references
to the fact that money was no longer used, and Gene was still around during part of that show's run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeakOil2008 Donating Member (200 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. Rick Berman is an Idiot
Seven very bad seasons of 'Voyager' alone proves as much. 'Enterprise' doesn't help.

I don't know that Gene Roddenberry was a radical extremist. However, he was ahead of his time on many issues. He was definitely very liberal in his belief that mankind would eventually evolve beyond pettiness and barbarism to reach for the stars and worlds beyond. As far as the OST diversity issue, I think Roddenberry was very much the driving force behind getting Sulu and Uhura onto the show. Supposedly, he had threatened to pull the plug on Star Trek, period, if NBC wasn't going to approve the characters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nomad559 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
8.  Roddenberry was an Atheist
http://www.visi.com/~markg/atheists.html

Gene Roddenberry, Creator of Star Trek (1921-1991).

"I condemn false prophets, I condemn the effort to take away the power of rational decision, to drain people of their free will--and a hell of a lot of money in the bargain. Religions vary in their degree of idiocy, but I reject them all. For most people, religion is nothing more than a substitute for a malfunctioning brain."
"We must question the story logic of having an all-knowing all-powerful God, who creates faulty Humans, and then blames them for his own mistakes."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Cool!
Jesse Ventura might be more entertaining with the religion comments he made in "Playboy" (naturally, he's an entertainer and not a politician for the people), but Gene Roddenberry's got true soul.

Gene sounds like a true progressive, I know he did NOT want catchphrases like "tricorder" and "warp" to become copyright protected. Paramount "protected" them all the same and sued the assesoff of anybody who used them, even in a context not entirely relevant to Trek. (such as IBM when they released their computer operating system "OS/2 Warp" in 1993...) I hate to think that, should humankind break the light barrier, that Paramount gets all the royalties. x(

Pity Paramount is the antithesis of Roddenberry...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryYoungMan Donating Member (856 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. Rodenberry was extremely liberal
Believe it. It's the reason he got kicked off the movie project after the first film, when Harve Bennett was brought in from TV to save the franchise. (He did, thanks to Nicholas Meyer.) But Rodenberry's intensely anti-military leanings are the reason the first movie is the way it is. (Not knocking it; just saying.) The beligerent approach to the unknown vs. Kirk who wins by UNDERSTANDING the alien etc. All Roddenberry. He was no "Libertarian"; that's ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. He was obviously a Socialist. as well a Secular Humanist.
Hell, I'm not the only one that sees that, everybody from the Religious Fanatics that hate him to the Far Left that Idolize him have varying degrees of Socialism attributed to his writings.

Here's just one of dozens of opinions from the web: http://iamnohero.com/columns/startrekhypocrisy.html

One more thing: I consider myself a Libertarian Socialist. I know it's tough to wrap one's brain around but I believe the Liberation of Individuals from Capitalism will be exactly that, a Liberation.

Smoke em' if you got em'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. Lib Soc!!
WWCD?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
12. I bought all my TNG DVD sets on ebay
averaged about $75 each.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kamika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. i downloaded them all
Dvd quality :D


getting ds9 now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nomad559 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. The Borg Megacube
The Borg Megacube - The Complete Star Trek: Next Generation Seasons 1 - 7

http://www.dvddebate.com/article.php?sid=3574&mode=&order=0&thold=
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
13. He was the 1991 recipient of the Humanist Arts Award
from the American Humanist Association. Here's a link to an interview in The Humanist: http://www.philosophysphere.com/humanist.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kamika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
14. considering religion
He was pretty secular i think. Im quite sure he came from a jewish backround but he did have a buddhist wedding.

He also had an affair with nichelle nichols that played uhura.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
17. I remember reading or hearing something about him
that put me off him. It was something to do with the theme song to the original Star Trek. Seems as though the guy that wrote the song was getting royalties for it, then Roddenberry came along years later and wrote lyrics to the song(did you know there were words to the song?!!!) just so that he could horn in on the royalties that this guy was making. I'm fuzzy on the details, but it just seemed pretty callous and unnecessary, as if he wasn't making enough off the show itself, you know?! I'd rather give some kudos to Lucille Ball(Desilu Studios), without whose support we wouldn't have ANY Star Trek! Yea, Lucy!!!!! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zolok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. He was a nice mid 1960's sixties California liberal
nowhere as good a writer as has been suggested.

Very much a creature of his times IMHO...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. And a writer who wanted big bucks
not a visionary.

It was sold as 'wagon train to the stars' and was a conglomeration of old sci-fi and comic books.

It was only ever meant to be TV adventurism and sex appeal.

It was all the other people (including the other writers) involved who provided context, vision and some organization to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aristus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Roddenberry was a horrible writer.
All of the worst written episodes of TOS were his. He should have stuck to the post of visionary.

It's like American Independence: John Adams and Ben Franklin had the vision, but they left the writing to the far more talented Thomas Jefferson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC