Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Here's what's wrong with the Bears:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
St. Jarvitude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 12:14 AM
Original message
Here's what's wrong with the Bears:
I'm going to break it into Offensive and Defensive:

Offensive


In terms of the passing game, I've traced the problem to one of two things:

  • John Shoop isn't giving Kordell the flexibility to make reads and adjust the play at the line of scrimmage. One particular example of this was on 3rd and 11 in the first quarter. Green Bay was blitzing up the middle with what looked like all three linebackers, leaving a gaping hole for a quick slant underneath. At this point, Kordell could have, and should have, adjusted David Terrell (in the slot) to run a quick in or a quick slant and rely on his breakaway speed to move the chains. Instead, Kordell left the play (a stupid screen to Anthony Thomas which resulted in negative yardage) and the Bears failed to convert.

  • Kordell isn't reading the defense. See ahove.


I'm going to lean towards the former. Madden pointed out during the game that Shoop had told Stewart to ignore his reads on the defense and look to Marty Booker and Desmond Clark on the majority of plays. Kordell is used to the more traditional (and better, imho) system of reading the defense at the line, adjusting the play (if necessary), and then giving each receiver a look after the snap.

The Bears actually looked like a competent passing team in the fourth quarter, until the final pick of the game. Stewart was finding the open man, and delivering it to him effectively to move the chains. Had the line provided just a second more protection on each play in the Bears' final push, who knows what could have happened?

The key to the Bears' running game is simple: give Anthony Thomas the ball. Backfield by committee works just about as well as bullpen by committee: it doesn't. Even if the A-Train is a little slow at first, once he pounds the defense into bits he can roll over them. Inside, outside, he can get it done. Adrian Nobody and Rabih Whatshisface should be at most spell HBs.

A healthy offensive line is a must for the Bears (or any team) to succeed offensively.

Defense


This is certainly trickier. The Bears defense is merely a shadow of 2001's. They give up too many big plays on the ground, and too many little plays in the air. Brian Urlacher should be placed either on man coverage on the tailback, or in a deeper underneath zone. Bobby Knight has the athlecticism to blitz on every play and still be able to stop the run. Warrick Holdman is the wild card in the linebacker corps: he can blitz or cover a tight end/fullback in man or zone coverage.

What the Bears need up front is a Ted Washington who can free Brian Urlacher up to stop the run. Sacrifice Warrick Holdman to the blockers if need be; Urlacher's speed and drive is useless if he's being pancaked by a tackle.

You may be surprised to hear me say that I have no problems with the Bears secondary. The Color Brothers (Mike Green + Brown) can lurk in the zone effectively, and R.W. McQuarters can cover 90% of receivers in man. Jerry Azumah is my only concern ... it might be a good idea to put in Tillman or Roosevelt Williams in at RCB to switch some coverage up.

I really believe the Bears have a lot of raw talent. It's time for the coaching staff + veterans of the team to step up to make the team work.

Thanks for reading my rant :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. Don't get so technical...
They signed Stewart. That's all anybody needs to know about the Bears.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. True story
Kordell stinks and has zero leadership ability. The only reason he ever won any games was the #1 rushing offense and #1 defense of the Steelers. Sorry, none of those conditions exist in Chicago, and I doubt you will get one win with KS at the helm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
topdog08 Donating Member (235 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. No leadership ability? I don't think Kordell is the problem.
How many games is he into the season with a new team? Give Kordell a chance. Is he gonna be MVP? Not likely. Is he the best QB the Bears have had in years? I think so. Now, if they had a decent offensive line or defensive secondary, they might be alright. The secondary has talent, but their coverage sucks. Getting beat once or twice is no problem. Leaving receivers wide open in the end zone again and again is not easy for any team to recover from. It seems like whenever I watch a Bears game they are always getting beat on the big pass plays. Free safety is the position I think they need some leadership in. They need a Mark Carrier or a Rod Woodson. They never got beat on pass plays so bad when they had Carrier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proudlib Donating Member (421 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. Good Points
"One particular example of this was on 3rd and 11 in the first quarter. Green Bay was blitzing up the middle with what looked like all three linebackers, leaving a gaping hole for a quick slant underneath. At this point, Kordell could have, and should have, adjusted David Terrell (in the slot) to run a quick in or a quick slant and rely on his breakaway speed to move the chains. Instead, Kordell left the play (a stupid screen to Anthony Thomas which resulted in negative yardage) and the Bears failed to convert."

I'll give another which also occurred in the first quarter.

Kieth McKenzie ran up to the weak side letting everyone in the stadium know that (a) a corner blitz was coming and (b) Dez White (or was it Terrell-they both stink) would be one on one with the safety who rotated over to cover him which meant that (c) the only thing between the reciever and the end zone was that lone safety who had absolutely no deep help. The other saftey was on the other side of the formation covering the strong side. Rather than audible to a fly or deep fade, Kordell stayed with the 5 yard button hook which was dropped anyway. The long and the short of it is that there was no option to go for the home run (see Manning, Peyton) when the defense basically dared the Bears to do so.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anti_shrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. Steeler fan adding his 2 cents
Kordell has a habit of trying to hard to make plays, and bad things usually result. He panics way too easy for an NFL starting QB, which is sad because he really can be something special when he's on his game.

The Bears offensive coordinator obviously has no clue how to build an offense around Kordell. An option pass in the pros? Does he take a notebook to high school games?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmileyBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. Here's what's wrong with the Bears: THEY SUCK!!!
They truely do suck more than a $300 Oreck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC