|
I see "Rock sucks" a lot of the time in The Wire, URB, Fader, etc. If I hear another tech-head gloat about how hiphop or electronica is the only music that matters and that rock is dead, I'll fart in a Yoo-Hoo bottle.
For all intents and purposes, what we're dealing with here is a lot of angry and confused rock fans and musicians who were/are upset that the music they loved and grew up with became something they no longer recognize(d). Record companies in the late 70's were pushing rock artists to incorporate disco rythyms into their music, with often hilariously bad results (The Grateful Dead, Warren Zevon, Kiss)....the rock fans were understandibly disappointed. The same is happening today, with record companies forcing bands to adopt turntables and rappers, their decisions based not on what the fans and the artists really want, but what their A&R departments say is cool this month. Thus, the bitterness among rockists toward electronica, and the bitterness to its 70's counterpart, disco.
The zeitgeist these days is that disco never died anyway, it just went underground, transmogrified into house, then techno, then drum 'n' bass, then jungle, and hiphop is only the most obvious descendent of the disco aesthetic (hiphop started when kids imitated the black, gay DJs like Larry Levan they saw spinning records in discos by holding street parties in the Bronx with their home stereos and a PA system.....apart from minor superficial changes here and there, it still remains identifiably disco-derived), and hiphop is now THEE dominant music in the marketplace. One cannot hope to get a record contract or even plan on playing music professionally without bowing to hiphop in some way (turntablists in concert, programmed beats in the studio). You could make a case that disco is still the dominant marketplace form. (BTW, this is not a value judgment on my part; I like a lot of underground hiphop, like El-P, The Coup, Anticon, Mr. Lif, etc.) History is on an endless loop, just like a disco 12".
So, what I'm trying to say is that disco won. What a bunch of racists did at Comiskey Park with a boxful of dynamite, in the end, did nothing but defer the rising tide anyways, so at this late a date, who gives a shit?
And all this is completely sidestepping what ought to be the central question anyways: is the music good? Sociological criteria shouldn't be one's yardstick in gauging whether an artist has merit; there are thousands of well-meaning bad records out there. Just because an artist is black or gay doesn't mean their work is worth a listen.
Lots of people in the late 70's did not think disco met their needs as music consumers.....did you really think that they'd cast aside their criticism of how disco sounded in order to maintain a patina of liberal respectability?
Anyways, nice discussing this with ya. I'm going to bed.
BTW, Jazz represents an almost wholly black American experience. Most of the major players today are still black.
|