Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Emergency Broadcasting Test Mistakenly Calls For Connecticut Evacuation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 07:53 AM
Original message
Emergency Broadcasting Test Mistakenly Calls For Connecticut Evacuation
<snip>

HARTFORD, Conn. -- Despite what residents may have seen on television, the state of Connecticut was not ordered evacuated Tuesday.

State emergency management officials believe someone pressed the wrong button, and instead of running a test of the emergency alert system, midday television viewers and radio listeners were told that the state was being evacuated.

"There is absolutely no evacuation or state emergency," said Kerry Flaherty, of the Office of Emergency Management. "It was an erroneous message."

The department was investigating how the alert was sent. Officials said it is manually released to broadcasters.

The error prompted Gov. M. Jodi Rell to issue a statement reassuring residents.

"We are looking into the circumstances and will take every step necessary to make certain this type of problem does not reoccur in the future," she said.

http://www.wftv.com/irresistible/4152096/detail.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. residents who heeded the warning
were gratefuL. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SarahB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. I missed that one.
Not having anything but Noggin and PBS on TV during the day has its perks at times. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Magrittes Pipe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. Thank God ChavezSpeakstheTruth didn't hear it.
He may have come HERE.

That's all I need -- another fuckin' hippy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. So, did the state collectively shit its pants or not?
(punny) :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. It crapped Mystic-by-the-sea right into the ocean.
It's part of Rhode Island now. Really!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. Connecticut is going to invade Massachusetts
My money is on the Bay State
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Magrittes Pipe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Have you ever been to Hartford?
Connecticut can kick Massachusetts' ass any damn day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. nah
Springfield is a quagmire waiting to happen...

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #8
19. Then again, CT has a submarine base.
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. We'd have to move fast
The Pentagon & White House are doing their best to run Sikorsky into the ground - canceling the Comanche helicopter and now outsourcing the presidential helicopter.

No more choppers for us if that happens.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #7
18. Boston could take care of Connecticut on it's own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
9. I must have missed this one
I actually don't know anybody who heard it - and my mom's flight came into Bradley Airport right around 2:00 yesterday.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SarahB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. I think you were in the Reminder again.
I saw a thing yesterday and I'm thinking "that has to be NewJeffCT". :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. I put one in there this week again
Somebody had criticized working wives a few weeks back and said how her life was better since she quit her job & stayed home with her 5 kids. I'm fine with her decision to do that, but I got upset when she criticized other working wives for materialism & greed. And, I'm certainly not going to tell my daughter she can't grow up to be just about anything she wants (I think playing Center for the LA Lakers is out of the question...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SarahB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. That was the one.
Most people need two incomes to survive. We lived on one income for many years and I was lucky he made enough for me to do that (well budgeted of course). A lot of it had more to do with his erratic work schedule for so many years and his own unwillingness to be flexible enough for me to pursue my goals than any mad desire to be a full-time homemaker (I would have been ok with working part-time as I did for a number of years, but at home full-time was often maddening in all honesty). Part of why I'm ending the marriage is his continual somewhat misogynistic attitudes regarding my career aspirations as somehow less-valid than his. He says it's not the case, but words and actions have been very different. I would have seen it and made different decisions if I were a bit older and more secure with myself when we first got together, but I was so young, I guess I just let his goals take over everything for a long time.

Fortunately, I'm still young enough that with a little extra effort (and in a field where it's possible), I'll be caught up in a few more years. It's tedious though in all honesty to be a woman with a brain trying to fit in with the majority of the SAHM world (around here anyway).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. SAHM?
and, I'm sure you'll do well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SarahB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. stay at home mom
Thanks. I tend to get wordy and rather rambling on this subject matter, but suffice it to say, certain still all too pervasive attitudes in our culture can piss me off at times. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Actually
I heard somewhere recently that 2 income families are the norm unless you are among the rich (the upper 1 or 2%) or the poor, where it would be cheaper to stay home rather than pay for daycare. The story was in the context that there SAHMs were now more common among those upper 1 or 2%.

Most in between families have 2 wage earners out of necessity...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. and...
I'm disappointed they didn't run any of my fact-based responses on the pseudo crisis in Social Security...

some liberal bias, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sweet Freedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. So which is scarier
that the the wrong warning was issued, or that no one heard it? Either way, the system didn't work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC