Binomials....I Don't Get It
Nailzberg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-03-05 07:41 PM
Original message |
Binomials....I Don't Get It |
|
Any mathletes wanna help me out and solve for x?
|
Fenris
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-03-05 07:42 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Binomials I can do. Trinomials present more of a problem. Monomials, however, are fun!
|
Goldeneye
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-03-05 07:43 PM
Response to Original message |
dsc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-03-05 07:43 PM
Response to Original message |
3. By binomials do you mean the distibution |
|
or simply solving an equation such as (x + 6)(x + 12) = 36
|
Nailzberg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-03-05 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
7. Well, actually I just wanted to be an ass. |
|
But I figure y'all know that.
|
Zing Zing Zingbah
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-03-05 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
8. For a problem like this you could use the |
|
Quadratic Equation to solve for x.
|
gtp1976
(326 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-03-05 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
Zing Zing Zingbah
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-03-05 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
(x+6)(x+12) = 36
No way is the answer is x = 9.
Plug in x = 9 into the equation and see what you get. (9+6)(9+12)=(15)(21)=315
OK, I think you were kidding when you gave that answer. I'm just going to solve this anyhow because I'm a major geek.
(x+6)(x+12) = x^2 + 6x + 12x + 72 = x^2 + 18x + 72 = 36
x^2 + 18x + 36 = 0
Use the Quadratic formula to find the roots, which will be the answer.
for ax^2 + bx + c = 0
x =( -b +|- sqrt(b^2 - 4ac))/2a
a = 1 b = 18 c = 36
x = (-18 +|- sqrt(18^2 - 4(1)(36)))/2(1) x = (-18 +|- sqrt(180))/2 x = -9 +|- 3/2*sqrt(20) x = -9 + -1.5*sqrt(20) and x = -9 + 1.5*sqrt(20) x is about -15.7 and -2.3
Check x = -9 + 1.5*sqrt(20) by substituting into original equation (-9 + 1.5*sqrt(20)+ 6)(-9 + 1.5*sqrt(20) + 12)= (-3 + 1.5*sqrt(20))(3+ 1.5*sqrt(20)) = -9 + 4.5*sqrt(20) + -4.5*sqrt(20) + (1.5)(1.5)(sqrt(20))(sqrt(20))= -9 + 45 = 36
Check x = -9 + -1.5*sqrt(20) by substituting into original equation (-9 + -1.5*sqrt(20) + 6)(-9 + -1.5*sqrt(20) + 12)= (-3 + -1.5*sqrt(20))(3 + -1.5*sqrt(20))= -9 + 4.5*sqrt(20) + -4.5*sqrt(20) + (-1.5)(-1.5)(sqrt(20))(sqrt(20))= -9 + 45 = 36
Thanks for all the fun math problems. I don't get to do this kind of crap any more being a stay at home mom.
|
gtp1976
(326 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-03-05 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
|
...I read (x+6)+(x+12)= 36 in which case 9 would = x, rather than (x+6)times(x+12)=36.
|
Zing Zing Zingbah
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-04-05 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #17 |
18. I see where you got your answer now... |
|
That makes sense. :)
I just noticed that I could have written 3/2sqrt(20) as 3sqrt(5). That would have been a lot simplier, and easy to read. It doesn't really matter anyhow, since they are the same number. I doubt anyone else cares either. :)
|
KG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-03-05 07:44 PM
Response to Original message |
4. simultaneous equations left a smoke crater in my mind. |
Zing Zing Zingbah
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-03-05 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
10. I love solving simultaneous equations. |
|
Augmented matrices are especially useful when solving simultaneous equations. There are tons of applications for simultaneous equations in engineering and computer science (3D Graphics, Robotics, etc.)
|
LynzM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-03-05 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. Ooh, gobzillions of applications.... |
|
I was an electrical engineering student, once.... :)
|
Zing Zing Zingbah
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-03-05 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
|
I took electrical engineering courses too. I was a computer engineering major, which is kind of a cross between electrical engineering and computer science.
|
LynzM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-03-05 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
|
That's what CE ended up being at my school... I kind of wish I'd gone the route of CS/CE, now. I got into database stuff/programming after I left school, and I really enjoy that.
|
Zing Zing Zingbah
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-03-05 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
16. Yeah.. but a lot of programming too. n/t |
Emops
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-03-05 07:44 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Crap like this was why I dropped my minor in statistics. |
|
And calculus is a thousand times worse.
|
Zing Zing Zingbah
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-03-05 07:50 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Yeah... it's just using the distributive property... |
|
(a+b)(c+d)
An easy way to see this is to use substitution first. Say substitute e in for c+d.
e = c+d
Now use the distributive property (a+b)e = ae + be
OK, now substitute c+d back in for e.
a(c+d) + b(c+d)
Notice you have to do distributive property two more times.
ac + ad + bc + bd
The foil technique is just a short cut to getting the same results.
|
Orsino
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-03-05 07:54 PM
Response to Original message |
9. "God made gay sex, not 3 + x." |
|
...should anyone desire a mindless slogan for his next parade.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:27 AM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.