Fixing the Bond franchise
CBGLuthier
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-05-05 01:08 PM
Original message |
Fixing the Bond franchise |
|
Ok it has come it now that they will be making the next movie without Brosnan. It will be Casino Royale as Tarentino suggested but they are using the director from GoldenEye so I don't expect much.
But it came to me in a flash last night how to fix Bond.
Set it in the 60's . Period. Bond does not belong past the cold war and he really only works best in the 60's. That way he can have unprotected sex, manhandle women and wear a hat and still seem cool.
That and cast Phillip Seymour Hoffman in the part. He would be the coolest Bond ever.
I am serious.
|
Borgnine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-05-05 01:12 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I actually liked GoldenEye. |
|
I'm not a Bond purist by any means, and I thought Brosnan was the best Bond since Connery.
|
Taxloss
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-05-05 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Although I think Lazenby was underrated.
|
CBGLuthier
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-05-05 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. I have nothing against Brosnan |
|
Even though Connery was the best.
They are looking for someone younger of course. The next Bond will probably be about 23 to hit that target demographic.
Too be honest, with the exception of Licence to Kill, I haven't seen any of the post Moore films and the last few of those really sucked.
And I haven't seen any of them in a theater since the horror that was MoonRaker. Worst Bond film period.
|
Taxloss
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-05-05 01:15 PM
Response to Original message |
3. The franchise is too tired. |
|
I think it might be time to lead it quietly to its grave.
|
giant_robot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-05-05 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Yeah, I haven't been able to sit through a Bond film in years... |
|
I am enjoying the new Bourne films though. I think Bourne may be the new Bond and Matt Damon may be the new Sean Connery.
|
snoochie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-05-05 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
I enjoyed those more than I've ever enjoyed Bond.
|
Taxloss
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-05-05 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
9. I'm not sure about them. |
|
They seem too self-important.
|
Borgnine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-05-05 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
The appeal of Bond to me is how irrevant it can be at times. Yes, most of them are goofy, but there's nothing wrong with some goofy entertianment now and then that brings out the kid in you.
|
snoochie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-05-05 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
7. I think you may be right. |
|
Even set in the 60's, the whole ubermacho womanzier schtick only seems workable in a comedic setting.
|
Taxloss
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-05-05 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. Quite. If the films aren't funny, they're nothing. |
|
And they're struggling to be funny.
|
smedwed
(51 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-05-05 01:49 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Having watched all of the films recently i actually think the new ones are by far the best with golden eye the best of them.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:55 AM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.