Bob Boudelang's Hate Mailbag....

[MrBenchley]

A fine selection from this week's column...

"Brent Albrecht" spouts:
Pretty lame, loser. Neither funny, nor coherant. Was that supposed to be sarcasm? Satire? Sorry sport, it was just pathetically unfunny (it's a word now, thanks to your failed attempt at humour). Better luck next time (ha, which is the same thing republicans have been, and will continue to be saying, to you dem losers after elections).

Patrick Green bloviates:
Unbelievably stupid article; devoid of significant factual analysis.
Minority party? Last time I checked, GWB received over 50% of the popular vote in the November elections.
Also, what are the plans of the Dems for Social Security? That Ponzi scheme pushed by the Dems over the last few decades is actuarially insolvent to the tune of $10-$12 trillion, give or take. The chicken is finally coming home to roost.
At least Bush said that he would listen to ideas. Given the fact that the Dems have offered no specifics as to what they would do, one can only assume that they would let benefits be cut by 25-30% in 2050, or whenever the IOU’s run out, as if such cuts are no big deal. If so, they (and you) should step up to the plate and be the first to volunteer immediate cuts of 25% in their own retirement benefits, including Social Security.
If stocks are so risky, I wonder why funded federal government retirement plans, as well as plans for the Teamsters, CALPERS, and the like, all invest in the stock market?
If we really wanted to help "the children", we would require all graduating high school students to have taken courses on economics, finance and taxes. I’m sure that the Dems would oppose such an idea, because once "the children" were armed with such knowledge, most would flee your beloved Democratic Party, for they would see the ruinous long-term implications of policies of the Dems.
And please, take an Economics 101 class, quickly.

And DannyNose9009, enraged at the resembelnce to his scummy dishonest self, fumes: "fuck you you piece of shit"

[CatWoman]

1. you Merica hater, you!!

:hi:

[MrBenchley]

9. LOL!

[patdem]

2. Why do these fine republicans hate you? Have I been stalking the wrong

man these oh so many years? Thought you were a true blue republican team leader...You disappoint me on so many levels...Why do I read your arcticles if you are not a republican? This disappointment is going to kill me I am sure. I will not stop stalking you, but I may stop talking about stalking you. Just you wait and see! :grr:

PS...you do know A-Swarengrerggerrge is here right? He sends his love and he and Maria and Oscar say :hi:

[MrBenchley]

10. I used to think all Republicans

were humorless, hate-filled ignorant twats...and now it's been confirmed.

[cornermouse]

3. Odd. I thought it was very funny.

I really do.

[MrBenchley]

14. Hey, Brent is the sort of goof

who thinks "Mallard Fillmore" is deep.....

[cornermouse]

17. lol.

[MrBenchley]

4. Bob Boudelang's Hate Mailbag....

A fine selection from this week's column...

"Brent Albrecht" spouts:
Pretty lame, loser. Neither funny, nor coherant. Was that supposed to be sarcasm? Satire? Sorry sport, it was just pathetically unfunny (it's a word now, thanks to your failed attempt at humour). Better luck next time (ha, which is the same thing republicans have been, and will continue to be saying, to you dem losers after elections).

Patrick Green bloviates:
Unbelievably stupid article; devoid of significant factual analysis.
Minority party? Last time I checked, GWB received over 50% of the popular vote in the November elections.
Also, what are the plans of the Dems for Social Security? That Ponzi scheme pushed by the Dems over the last few decades is actuarially insolvent to the tune of $10-$12 trillion, give or take. The chicken is finally coming home to roost.
At least Bush said that he would listen to ideas. Given the fact that the Dems have offered no specifics as to what they would do, one can only assume that they would let benefits be cut by 25-30% in 2050, or whenever the IOU’s run out, as if such cuts are no big deal. If so, they (and you) should step up to the plate and be the first to volunteer immediate cuts of 25% in their own retirement benefits, including Social Security.
If stocks are so risky, I wonder why funded federal government retirement plans, as well as plans for the Teamsters, CALPERS, and the like, all invest in the stock market?
If we really wanted to help "the children", we would require all graduating high school students to have taken courses on economics, finance and taxes. I’m sure that the Dems would oppose such an idea, because once "the children" were armed with such knowledge, most would flee your beloved Democratic Party, for they would see the ruinous long-term implications of policies of the Dems.
And please, take an Economics 101 class, quickly.

And DannyNose9009, enraged at the resembelnce to his scummy dishonest self, fumes: "fuck you you piece of shit"

[Goldeneye]

5. What thought provoking letters.

I'm convinced...I'm going to go become a republican now.

[MrBenchley]

11. LOL!

[rockymountaindem]

6. I also favor public high school instruction in economics,

specifically macroeconomics. Of course, I think that would make more people join the Democrats, if people actually retain what they learn in class!

[MrBenchley]

15. Agreed....

I guess I missed the part of the Democratic platform that opposed economics studies for high school students.

[jmowreader]

7. Oh, you've outdone yourself this time...

"And of course, the centipede of his Great Second Term is his ambitious proposal to get rid of Social Security by instituting privateering..."

[MrBenchley]

12. Thanks...

I mcan tell when I've hit a nerve, because freepers like this send me hate mail.

[CAcyclist]

8. OTOH, this cartoon uses a caterpillar image

http://www.sfgate.com/comics/meyer/

I thought I'd send it on in case you hadn't seen it. Just thought it was interesting.

[MrBenchley]

13. LOL!

Thanks.

[Stockholm]

16. LOL Guess that means it´s too close for comfort n/t

[MrBenchley]

18. I think so...

It also seems that these imbeciles think that everybody they hate is just going to "go away" because some phony "milestone" or another (like the election farce in Iraq, or the SOTU speech) has been passed.

[MrBenchley]

19. Pat Green Opens His Ignorant Yap AGAIN

"Your comment confirms your intellectual void. No direct analysis and response to the issues posed, as is the usual DU response. The facts are indeed inconvenient, for you.

Learn to lose."

Remember, this is a guy writing to an obviously fictional character.