Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Calif. County Wants Pot Certified Organic

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Tafiti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 03:41 PM
Original message
Calif. County Wants Pot Certified Organic
BERKELEY, Calif. - Medical-marijuana growers in Mendocino County — a Northern California outpost that is home to vegans, vintners, libertarians and aging hippies — want to have their pot certified as organic.

The notion of pesticide-free pot is making some people smile. But county officials say the issue is serious, and they are asking the state whether they can regulate pot-growing and pronounce some crops organic.

They say that with no system to regulate cultivation, consumers are at risk.

"We regulate wine grape growers and pear growers and everybody else, so why shouldn't we also regulate pot growers?" said Tony Linegar, assistant agricultural commissioner for Mendocino County. "It's really an agricultural crop. In our estimate, it should be subject to a lot of the same laws and regulations as commercial agriculture."

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=534&e=2&u=/ap/20050218/ap_on_he_me/organic_pot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. It really does make sense
since it is being used to treat such vulnerable populations - and most chemicals used in agriculture are carcinogenic...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tafiti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I agree.
I'd be pissed off if I was looking to enjoy a good joint or bowl, and I got sick from it because of pesticides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. I wish
Now if California is there any hope for Texas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Texas? they have to ok it for medicinal use
first. I predict that wil happen right after Virginia does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. I wish
Now if California wins this is there any hope for Texas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. I wish
Now if California wins this is there any hope for Texas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. Oops my computer got the hiccups or something.
Edited on Fri Feb-18-05 03:50 PM by foxy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Wow! A Quadruple post!
Congrats ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. My computer got the hiccups sorry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tafiti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Whoa! Are you OK? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sporadicus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. Makes Perfect Sense to Me
After all, the pot is ostensibly being grown for medicinal use - including relief from the pain associated with cancer. Seems reasonable to ensure that no carcinogenic compounds are introduced through smoking contaminated weed. I imagine a fair amount of recreational users could get behind assurances that their pot contained no pesticides or other chemicals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tafiti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Right.
Especially in the medicinal cases. It would defeat the purpose of being medicine if it contained carcinogens or other harmful chemicals.

But yes, recreational users would also appreciate it, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sporadicus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
12. dupe. pay no mind
Edited on Fri Feb-18-05 03:50 PM by Sporadicus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC