Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Beatles or Stones

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
xmas74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 06:21 PM
Original message
Beatles or Stones
No polls-just good discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JimmyJazz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Neither. End of discussion.
:P

I'm kidding, btw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xmas74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That's ok
I started this discussion with someone on another thread. It was a joint decision to move it.
Besides, this is one that music lovers sometimes get fired up about.
My choice is Beatles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soupkitchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Pre or Post Copulation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xmas74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Which ever is better for you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. I heard the Beatles first.
Edited on Thu Feb-24-05 06:33 PM by IMModerate
And the seminal impression I got was that unlike the rock of that time, (early 60s) here was a band that didn't recreate the same music over and over. The amazing thing was that they had a half dozen songs on the charts, and with each new one the reaction was, "That's the Beatles too?" They switched styles, rotated leads and harmonies, and got amazing versatility. Caught my ear though I didn't listen to rock much at the time.

The Stones presented a contrast, darker, more blues based and traditional, with a line up whose tasks were more set. Mick sang and Keith played guitar, but there was Brian Jones, who was the wild card. Saying Beatles or Stones is like saying right leg or left leg.

--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xmas74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. But which leg do you favor?
See you followed me over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I'm a tap dancer.
We don't favor either foot. There was only one great one-legged tap dancer that I know of, Pegleg Bates.


--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xmas74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benny05 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. Agree
When I was a kid and watched Ed Sullivan (horrors--you know now I was a true child in the 60's), the Beatles stole the show. The Stones played "Round and Round" and "Little Red Rooster" which at the time didn't impress me. When I hear those goldies by the Stones at concerts, I love the songs more knowing they were big fans of McKinley Morganfield.

So, it's left and right arms for me....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. Each did something that really impressed me.
For the Beatles, it was "We Can Work It Out," which has a tricky time signature change. Blew my jazz addled mind.

For the Stones it was the cover of Bobby Troup's classic, "Route 66." Get your kicks...

--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xmas74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. We can work it out was an excellent song.
You are a jazz fan?
I am more blues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. In my old age, I have become very eclectic.
But jazz was my first love.

--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xmas74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I always liked jazz
but blues was my first love.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Well blues is one of the precursors of jazz.
Of rock too. Almost all early rock, e.g. Chuck Berry, Little Richard is based on 12 bar blues progression. And most of the rest of it too.

--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. My favorite Beatles is, "The Long and Winding Road." I..
Edited on Thu Feb-24-05 08:00 PM by Kahuna
don't know why. It has no particular meaning to me. It's the way it's sung. It's just so beautiful and haunting. It gives me chills just thinking about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. The sequel: "Why Don't We Do It In The Road?" is another...
Edited on Thu Feb-24-05 09:09 PM by IMModerate
example of what I was saying. Consider how different these two "road" songs are. And coincidentally, both by Paul.

I wish he'd done this one at the SuperBowl.

--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
14. For me, The Stones.
I just like the Stones harder edged, "man in the street" type songs better than the pop fluff of the early Beatles. Both bands are great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. That's Brian Epstein and George Martin
They pushed the "Love Me Do," "Hold Your Hand" stuff and put them in uniforms. And considering the audience, strategy was effective. Remember, they were tempered in the caves of Hamburg.

There was pop, but no fluff after that. "Beatles '65", for instance: First feedback guitar in "I Feel Fine" (according to Lennon). And harbingers of "folk" rock to come, in "I'll Follow the Sun" and "I'm A Loser." Over all, the album has an ironic tongue-in-cheekiness that gives it an edge.

I really agree with your overall assessment, just wanted to defend the Beatles on fluff.

--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
15. I prefer the Beatles. But the Stones are a very close second for me..
Edited on Thu Feb-24-05 08:03 PM by Kahuna
Two exceptional bands. I love the poetry of both bands. I love the ballads that the Beatles did. And, I'm not a person who generally likes ballads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfan454 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
19. Beatles hands down for me n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
20. In most cases, it's a matter of apples and oranges.
I like them both. Both are good in their way. I refuse to choose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC