Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My encounter with a serial killer.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
MikeG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 02:56 PM
Original message
My encounter with a serial killer.
I was three years out of law school in 1987 when I represented a man named Gary Robbins, who seemed a little excitable and nervous, but who needed to save his house from a Sheriff' Sale.

I met him one time, filed his bankruptcy case and stopped the Sheriff's sale. His case was ultimately dismissed.

Some months later I found out that he was a serial killer who duct-taped his victims, always females, and then raped and strangled them.

His MO was to pose as a door-to-door insurance salesman. He tried it on the wife of a state trooper, who got away and called the police, who chased him onto the PA Turnpike, where he "committed suicide".

It still creeps me out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Pretty creepy.
Was that in W. PA?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Pittsburgh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why are so many serial killers named Gary?
Gary Ridgway, Gary Gilmore, Gary Walker... there are others... and now your Gary.

Weird!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stealther Donating Member (85 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. A lot of them seem to have the middle name "Wayne", too
(eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davsand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I still think killers are supposed to have three nmes.
Lee Harvey Oswald, John Wayne Gacy, John Wilkes Booth

Makes me wonder...

Laura
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanuckAmok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. A friend of mine's backyard backed onto Paul Bernardo & Karla Holmolka's
back yard. They used to walk his dog sometimes.

When they were arrested, the police dug up my friend's yard with a backhoe... but luckily there was nothing to find.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Those two were really sick.
Really very sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I read a book about them
They were horrid.

Did she get out of prison yet? I was shocked at her short sentence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. didn't they even kill her sister?
sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanuckAmok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Yes...
In a nutshell...

They drugged her sister on Christmas Eve with animal tranquiliser and liquor so they could have sex with her, and Karla, who was a veterinarian assistant, administered too much, and she died.

But the other two deaths were intentional, and also Paul B was identified as the Scarborough Rapist, who had been evading police for years.

Holmolka got such a short sentence for testifying against her husband, which she was not rerquired to do under Canadian law.

It pissed many people off, particularly as she admitted under examination that she was instrumental in her sister's death, but couldn't be charged with anything to do with that death, because of her arrangment with the prosecution.

The whole case was a fuck-up, from lack of communication between regional police forces, the defense attorney surpressing key evidence, and the crime scene being poorly handled by the forensics teams.

They could have been caught months earlier if only the police had better inter-force communication. It could even be argued that if the Niagara Regional Police had paid more attention to the profile of the Scarborough Rapist, they may have caught Bernardo before anyone was murdered.

I wouldn't worry about Holmolka being released into the public. Either she will be kept inside, or she'll be killed the minute she gets out. She's far safer in prison.

For me, that's one of those "six dregrees" things. Being such a small community, everybody seemed to know them, or know of them, even before the arrests; one of my friends' sisters was a bridesmaid at their wedding, they were married in my mother's church, and a someone else I knew lived next door to Karla's parents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. i think it got such huge press here in the states because
the couple was so attractive. Interesting you were so close to it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. IIRC, this case demonstrated the difference between US and
Canada, with regard to freedom of the press. Weren't a lot of the details of the trial kept secret from the public? The Canadian papers were forbidden to publish them, so Canadians were crossing into the States to get papers and magazines with the details? I seem to recall something about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanuckAmok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. That's correct
I was overseas for the first part, but I was working at a friend's radio station toward the time the trial began, and I actually covered one of Bernardo's appearances in court. It was an arraignment or a bail hearing...I forget.

There was a publication ban on certain aspects of the case.

In Canada, publication bans are fairly rare, and usually invoked to protect the victims or their families. There are otyher reasons for invocing publcation ban orders...

It's not really about freedom of the press, per se. It's more about the protection of the rights of the individual, but as I mentioned, it's a rather rare occurrence.

My lawyer explained the spirit behind the creation of the publication ban lasw as such:

You're a doctor, and one of your patients accuses you of sexually assaulting her during an exam. You would be able to have a publication ban placed on your case, because it's been proven that people tend to believe such allegations until proven untrue (and even then, there's doubt). Your reputation and your ability to earn a living would be jeapordised by your identity being released.

However, if you're found guilty of the charges, the ban would likely be lifted.

I'm sure HEyHEY could tell us more about this, being a journalist and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Oh that's interesting. Too bad we don't do more of that here
sometimes. People's reputations are routinely ruined, without a second thought, by the US vulture press. Unless, of course, you are G.W. Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. You met Bush????
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. I met this woman
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorothea_Puente

My parents took me to work with them when I was a small child. Mom would have to call her from time to time when her tenants would be too drunk to get themselves home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Archae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
14. I may have encountered Jeffrey Dahmer on a Milwaukee bus.
When I was living there in 1986-1987.
Really quiet guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaMan Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. May have?
You've made it clear that you had a rather long conversation with him at a bus stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
19. Never met a serial killer
But I went to law school with a guy who was later the first person in Alabama to be charged with attempted murder for intentionally giving someone HIV. He killed himself before his case came to trial.

I also met a guy from my husband's home town who was a teacher and was later charged with numerous counts of child molestation. My husband and his siblings had known this person all their lives and never guessed there was anything wrong with him. He did some really evil stuff, like preying on boys who had no father living in the home. He would befriend them for a long time before he started molesting them, so they would feel too attached to him and too guilty to turn him in. He was able to get away with this stuff for a long time. He's doing life in prison.

:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC