Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wow, this Oscar telecast was REALLY boring.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Ruffhowse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 11:59 PM
Original message
Wow, this Oscar telecast was REALLY boring.
The Grammies were way better and more entertaining this year. Also, PLEASE give up the lame idea of presenting some awards in the aisle or in the balcony seats. People who win deserve the long walk to the stage and to receive their award ON STAGE. And having all nominees on stage when only one wins and the rest have to skulk off is disgraceful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Melodybe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
1.  Chris Rock was great!
I completely disagree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joefree1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, but how about that opening by Chris Rock?
Bush as the Gap Store was priceless.


Seating now available in the Smoking Section:
Politics, humor, death and the Devil - http://www.eDiablo.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's the time issue and the censorship issue.
They had to find a way to shorten the time, and that's what they came up with. They're not going to cut Clint Eastwood off because the winner of the editing Oscar took too long....

IMO, they shouldn't televise half the awards--which has apparently been bandied about, as the winner of...the editing award I think...emphasized that the sound/editing Oscars were creative and not technical awards (therefore having to be shown tonight).

I don't know how they could liven it up, they seem to be too concerned about moving it along timewise. And there's the good ole seven second delay...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
4. It sucked! Thos lame ideas of presenting awards in the aisle or
on stage w/ the nominees there. Horrible...like a cattle call,

But, but..it saves TIME (course they won't cop to that).

Also, did you notice the movie clips were so short. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SouthernDaisy Donating Member (80 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. I totally agree
Edited on Mon Feb-28-05 12:38 AM by SouthernDaisy
and just coz Rock dissed the chimpboy doesn't mean he didn't suck. Sean Penn took exception to Rock's bad taste in dissing of some fellow actors too.

Robin Williams couldva done a better job.

It was the most boring awards show I've watched...cattle call aptly describes the event!

However, I'm glad that Jamie Foxx won best actor--he was great in 'Ray'...and hooray for my fav, Morgan Freeman who won for supporting-actor!






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. I couldn't believe it when I saw them
presenting awards in the damn aisle. You reach the pinnacle of your profession and win a prestigious award and then you don't get to go on stage to accept it? If I had won in one of those categories, I'd have blown past the stupid mike in the aisle, gone onstage, and graciously said "Thank you."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
5. I disagree
I thought they made some necessary changes to move the program along and keep it from lasting all night. I especially loved the fact that they didn't highlight each nominated best picture film throughout the night.

I enjoyed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patiod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I thought the "cattle call" was a great idea
Why sit through everyone sliding through their row of seats, , acccepting congratuations, walking down the aisle, etc.

Why not have everybody up on stage? It gives the nominees their "moment in the sun".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. I respectfully disagree.
Highlighting the nominated films is one of the important parts of the ceremony, much more so than who the makeup winner thanks or a long speech by the costume designer; I really missed it this year.

While I didn't think it was a bad idea to have all of the nominees in certain categories on stage during the naming of the nominees and the announcement of the winner (that way, they ALL get to be on stage, not just the winner and for most of these people it's the ONLY time they'll ever be on stage at the Oscars), it's a HORRIBLE idea to do some presentations in the aisles. ALL winners deserve to be on stage. It practically screamed "you're not important enough." PLEASE don't let them do that next year!

And they should really just show about half of the awards, as important as all of them are, most people really, frankly don't give a shit about a lot of them, such as makeup, costume design, art design, sound mixing, sound editing, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
6. It isn't supposed to be boring?
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shredr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
9. I could not disagree more
Edited on Mon Feb-28-05 12:19 AM by Shredr
Chris Rock was hilarious. The show clipped along at a great pace.

Beyonce's performances were sensational (I could have done without Antonio Bandaras singing in place of the Oscar winner -- I thought that was a little tacky).

I really liked the refreshing format of presenting different awards from around the beautiful theatre. It made the show far less formal and stuffy.

Change is good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MessiahRp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
10. I hate awards shows...
They are a colossal waste of time and there are far too many of them that really give celebrities too many awards. Point in case tonight... the humanitarian Oscar went to someone who restores film.

These things are too much about Hollywood praising itself repeatedly (the SAG awards are the worst) and not caring what the people that pay to see the movies think.

Rp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. The SAG awards are a good idea, I think.
Kind of unnecessary, sure, but any union has dinners/things...

and I dig the statues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Floogeldy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
11. The Grammies sucked and you are a TROLL!
}(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Technowitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
14. This differs how from every previous year?
I once made the mistake of trying to watch the Oscars with a friend who adored the show.

Two hours in, I woke up to see her shaking me, a deeply annoyed expression on her face. "You were snoring!" she scolded.

I apologized, then said, "Hey, you were the one who suggested a night of Hagen Daaz and pajamas."

Needless to say, she didn't ask me over to do that again, though we did remain friends. Probably *because* she didn't make the same mistake twice.

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PennyK Donating Member (382 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
16. What about Robin Williams?
The Times had an article today saying that Robin had been forbidden to do his song mocking Dr. Dobson (written by my dear Mark Shaiman)...but he seemed to do most of the material anyway! It was to have been a Baptist minister tune. Brave guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okoboji Donating Member (510 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
17. why was the
Oscars so early this year?

usually they are at the end of March, not in Feburary...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scooter24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 04:04 AM
Response to Original message
18. I thought the evening was great
AMPAS is trying everything under the sun to make the telecast more enjoyable. Younger hosts, shorter speeches, new approaches to directing- and every year people find some reason to complain about how boring it was.

Let's face it, until the Oscar Awards becomes a box-office popularity contest then there will always be someone who finds it boring. We are honoring the art of filmmaking, and I believe tonight's show was right on the money to convey its intended purpose.

Chris Rock was a bit abrasive , and I like him as a stand-up comedian, but I feel we all have gotten used to the same ol' Carson, Crystal, Goldberg, and Martin type of comedy that when a younger style of comedy is introduced, people are quick to object.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fleabert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 04:11 AM
Response to Original message
19. I totally agree, we needed more Rock and less
of the stuff you listed! I love the simplicity of the awards themselves, but I like to be entertained as well! The sets were horrible, two cardboard trains, two headlights, and some fog and snow for a song? I've seen better set work at high school productions!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC