Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Americans and Romans, Europeans and Greeks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Muesli Donating Member (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 06:19 AM
Original message
Americans and Romans, Europeans and Greeks
Edited on Tue Oct-14-03 06:32 AM by Muesli
Isn't there a parralel?

A powerful, moralistic, somewhat hypocritical society of people who act. It's power based on a invincible military and huge economy and still on the rise.

and

A squabbling, decadent, group of nations, filled with people who sit and think, instead of working. Reminiscent of a "glorious" past of colonialism and military power.



What will happen if history repeats itself?

Europe will decline into one of the globe's poorest regions.

The USA will turn into a dictatorship first and will then be overrun by some tribal culture 400 years later.

We're doomed :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. the Greek's have never been in the dire condition you imply
"sit and think, instead of working" implies one can not do both - and again - the Greeks (as wel as many many other folks)seemed to show this was not true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muesli Donating Member (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. wrong word used.
Edited on Tue Oct-14-03 08:30 AM by Muesli
I meant "acting" as in stop debating and start doing.


The Greek mainland however did see a period of relatively strong decline after the Peloponesian war.

Europe's relative decline is also due to wars between almost equally strong opponents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I don't think Europe is declining--it's on the rise. We're declining
Thanks to our ignorance and arrogance.

If Dumbo is re-defeated in 2004 and again assumes office, we are doomed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patriot_Spear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. No parralel... but there are some interesting observations.
Particularly when you consider the late empire's reliance on native troops while the leadership avoided military service- sound like anyone we know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muesli Donating Member (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. More came to mind
Edited on Tue Oct-14-03 09:15 AM by Muesli
Caesar convinced the senate and the people that the threat of an attack by the Gauls was absolute and a "preemtive strike" was necessery.

The Romans had their own problems with fundamentalists, at that time it was the christians. There even are some historians who think it is true that the great fire in Nero's reign was a christian terrorist act. I admit it sounds far-fetched, but the fear was real for the Romans.


-edit- spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Proof that history repeats itself
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Is "convinced" the right word?
If I remember my Plutarch (which would be an absolute miracle), the senate specifiaclly told Caesar NOT to invade the Gauls, and then he did anyway, which is why they summoned him to Rome w/o his army to face charges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I think you're right about Caesar being summoned for his actions
I think his actions led to his assasination, because he did this, and the senators were starting to fear him.

Not sure if I'm getting the chronology right, but I seem to recall this chain of events.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muesli Donating Member (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. I'm not sure anymore
Edited on Tue Oct-14-03 09:22 AM by Muesli
You could be right. But I think that they summoned him back without his army out of fear of his popularity with his troops, afraid (justly so) he would try to gain absolute power.

hmmmm... How popular is Bush with the military?

PS. Of course I meant to spell parallel correctly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. I don't think he's very popular with them these days
Hooray!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC