|
A little background: I separated from the Army last year as an officer with 6 years experience and a college education. I didn't want to get out, but I tore up my knees (Airborne) and had to get out.
So, anyways, I've been pretty much unemployed since last year. In all, I estimate my take-home to be around $10,000 for the last year, which is atrocious. My wife and I had to postpone buying a house and starting a family because we just wouldn't be able to swing it financially.
So, I just got off the phone with the good ol' federal gubment inquiring about jobs and career advice. I've always wanted to get back into my degree area (geology), but they do not care that you have a degree and managerial, team-leading experience. They want automatons who hammer rocks and clock in and clock out daily.
So, I was thinking during this conversation, that taking a job paying 29K is better than what I am making right now, but what are the sacrifices?
1) I would be starting out at entry level...a point at which I should have started 7 years ago, when I graduated college. 2) I would be almost a decade behind the power curve and my peers (which is more a blow to my confidence than anything.)
So, this rant may seem a little out of place, but what do people here think? Should I entertain taking a job paying $20,000 less than my last one or should I look at it from the perspective of this being a pay raise over my current situation?
When I was in the Army, captains were leaving in droves. Now, I fear I may have been a victim of that lemming mentality. The grass is not greener on the other side, at least monetarily speaking. I do miss the snazzy uniforms, tho.
Brian
|