Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is reading a romance novel cheating? Eating chocolate?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
RPM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 08:51 PM
Original message
Is reading a romance novel cheating? Eating chocolate?
I mean, if your wife looks to romance novels to fulfill desires for stories of unbridled romance, instead of getting that from her husband, is that cheating. She would seem to be seeking gratification traditionally associated with the marriage from an extra marital source.

What about chocolates - some studies have associated the female sensations resulting form chocolate consumption with those women experience after sex. If the wife eschews sex and seeks such gratifying feelings from chocolate, is she cheating on her man?

Thoughts? Comments? Flames?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Personally I define cheating as it involves another REAL person.. includin
fantasies. If hubby wants to secretly lust over startlets that's fine.. but if he starts lusting over the gal down the street. that's dangerous. It's too close to home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RPM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Starlets aren't real people?
Edited on Wed Jun-08-05 08:57 PM by RPM
or don't people on TV or in Books count?

I wish that were the case - then BUsh wouldnt exist (he's only on TV...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. No they aren't real people you can tryst with. I do wish ** wasn't real
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RPM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. the people may not be accessable, but the feelings are
as i see it, the larger issue is, if you seek gratification in a way that deprives a spouse of the role of providing that gratification, one is on thin ice; whether it is looking at porn or eating bon-bons...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. There is a line. Some is healthy some is not. Only a couple can decide
for themselves what is all right and what is not. For example, what if the spouse does not feel like (s)he is being deprived.. but rather spared? Not everyone has the same sex drive.

And sometimes this sort of thing isn't necessarily sexual. I myself sometimes fantasize about what it would be like to be involved with a liberal minister *lol* Why? Because I married into a conservative evangelical family. Do my mental wanderings mean I don't love my husband? No. But it does show that I do wish sometimes that we were more similiar in nature where politics and religion are concerned.

No one is ever 100% satisfied with their mates. It is impossible to be so since we are all human and have failings and flaws. The trick is to recognize that and love each other anyway. And to be happy for what is good in them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RPM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Agreed - Couldn't have said it better.
In the end, it is a matter for each couple to establish for themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yep. I had to cut back on my romance novels after we first married
because they hurt hubby's feelings that I would rather read than be with him (these days it's more likely to be DU that is distracting me *lol*), and he had to give up the porn, which he never really did much of (that I know) anyway.

But we have left ourselves the little fantasies and we dont' discuss them, because when we do feelings get hurt. Some things are better left private. Like that liberal minister thing. *l*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. Are you seriously comparing eating chocolate to boobs in your face?
Really?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RPM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. yes - in the sense that each is being used to satisfy an internal desire..
...a desire that would most healthily be fulfilled by the other partner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
10. Come on..
.... everyone need food for their fantasies. "Cheating" has to involve physical contact.

Well, really it doesn't. IMHO, there is a such thing as emotional intimacy - and either partner seeking it outside of marriage is also cheating.

But reading a book, looking at erotica, stuff like that I think is healthy.

But what do I know :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC