Randi is going OFF about the MJ case. - Democratic Underground

ronnykmarshall

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Jun-13-05 04:25 PM
Original message

Randi is going OFF about the MJ case.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

matcom

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Jun-13-05 04:26 PM
Response to Original message

1. can you be any LESS specific?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

cajones_II

(149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Jun-13-05 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #1

2. how about "Randi" ....

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Elidor

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Jun-13-05 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #2

8. LMAO

:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Misunderestimator

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Jun-13-05 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #1

3. He could have said "Randi is going off about something"

so, yes... :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

iamjoy

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Jun-13-05 04:28 PM
Response to Original message

4. How So?

Is she pissed he was acquitted?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Zuni

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Jun-13-05 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #4

5. I am

the jury basically said everyone but MJ is a liar

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

ronnykmarshall

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Jun-13-05 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #5

6. I liked her point about the booze and porn.

Get real.

At LEAST he should have been convicted of that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Kraklen

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Jun-13-05 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #5

7. Well, they were proven to be liars...

during testimony...

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

gollygee

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Jun-13-05 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #5

9. They said it hadn't been proven beyond a reasonable doubt

"more likely than not" or "we think he's more likely than the other folks to be lying" isn't enough to convict someone.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

iamjoy

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Jun-13-05 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #9

10. That's My Point

Edited on Mon Jun-13-05 07:54 PM by iamjoy

The prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt, not present enough evidence that you wouldn't trust the accused with your child.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

dxstone

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Jun-13-05 10:37 PM
Response to Original message

11. He's a friggin' child molester, man...

I'm amazed how many people seem to think that's okay...
How many kids have to accuse this guy? How weird and extraordinarily bizarre and sneakily suspicious and openly manipulative and over-dramatic does his behavior have to be in order for people to say "ENOUGH!"
I guess some folks just can't turn down an offer of free babysitting...

d

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Fri Dec 27th 2024, 03:56 AM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.