LMAO! Scientists prove Girls are Evil.

[dhinojosa]

That's probably why I love em.

[kick-ass-bob]

1. AAAAA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!

God, I am a geek.

:rofl:

[redqueen]

3. No, you're not.

If you were, you'd probably have commented on how "=" is not analagous to "require", therefore the whole equation is flawed. :P

[texas1928]

5. So since you did does that make you the geek?

:shrug:

[VelmaD]

7. It also doesn't say money is the SQUARE root...

of evil.

Not to mention the actual biblical quote is that the love of money is the root of all evil.

[redqueen]

10. See now... here's a geek!

:loveya:

[kick-ass-bob]

12. but in short hand math

root=square root
because there are cube roots, etc. which are specified.

:crazy:

[billyskank]

9. And also,

a real geek would have pointed out that actually,

girls = +-evil

:)

[ghostsofgiants]

15. No...

A REAL geek doesn't know what the hell a girl is.

[billyskank]

17. They may have heard about them on usenet.

Hell, a real geek probably never sees the sun!

[IChing]

2. Yeah good point but you gotta love em.

I do

[IChing]

4. more math/logic

[SarahB]

6. Yes, but again...

we're soft and we smell really good. :D

[Beetwasher]

8. Hmmm, Just Cuz I'm A Geek, I Have to Point Out the Error in This Proof

Time and Money is NOT Time x Money, it's Time + Money.

Therefore, the whole proof falls apart. Sorry. You get an "F" on the exam. :evilgrin:

[redqueen]

11. I just loves DU geeks!

:loveya:

[kick-ass-bob]

13. not if time=money=2.

then we're back on!

:bounce:

[Commie Pinko Dirtbag]

22. The correct answer then is

Girls = 1.41421 * sqrt(Evil)

[northzax]

23. ahh, interesting extrapolation

but social science proves you wrong. Obviously, time and money are directly proportional to each other, the more of one you have, the less of the other is required. And there is a blatant multiplier effect, having money and time together is worth multiples of having only one of them in excess. Say time and money are on a scale of 1-10, adding them together gives you a maximum avaliable score of 20. Now, as we all know, having both time and money is more than doubly as attractive as someone with either time or money. Thus the multiplication.

but I wouldn't expect geeks to know this. :)

[DrGonzoLives]

26. I noticed that a long time ago

Damn wannabe nerds trying to write geek humor.

[texas1928]

14. Girls are evil and they have COOTIES

Don't catch the cooties. They are dangerous.

[gkhouston]

21. no, no, no

BOYS have cooties. It's the base step in the induction proof of "men are scum". ;-)

[texas1928]

30. Nuh UH

Girls are Cootie infested. and they try and kiss us and gets us infested. And Cooties can ruin any good boy and make him chase girls.

[Shoeempress]

16. Basic logical flaw in the basic assumption. Girls don't require money

girls who get paid for sex require money, thus, what it should be is Female Sex Workers. And in fact that is sexist as there are male sex workers who also require money, so I guess the real equation would be Sex Workers = time + money. And now the premise is blown.

[dhinojosa]

18. Uhm, wrong....

I have to go with my girlfriend shopping and I can prove with each visit that girls require money, and that alone doesn't guarantee sex.

:sarcasm:

[Shoeempress]

19. Just because your girlfriend takes your money, doesn't mean all girls do

I have my own money, and I'm a girl.

[LastKnight]

20. has anyone ever bought you dinner or anything like that?

if you hang out with anyone for any substantial period of time, their bound to cost you money sooner or later. especially in the context of a relationship, because you dont offer to buy your friends meals as much as you do your SO in most cases... and other stuff like that... little gifts, ect... you get where im goin with this.

its not that we are saying they activley seek out our money...(at least most of em dont, anyway) just that social conventions say that we pay for the dinner and movie and whatever other entertainment for the evening. granted, i would anyway, but thats what we mean by 'time and money'.

and all were sayin is its usuially the guy spendin the dough.

thus, money.

[dhinojosa]

25. She doesn't take my money at any time....

:wtf:

When you spend money on someone, you pay, you don't hand the money over so they can pay. What kind a crazed backwards thinking is that?

:sarcasm:

[Mad_Dem_X]

29. Brava!

We're not all golddiggers.

[SarahB]

24. Huh?

Get a girlfriend that has sex with you because she enjoys having sex with you, not because of "stuff". All women like a man to treat them like they're special, but buying them stuff at the store for sex just seems like a weird sort of dynamic. Sorry. I guess I just find it hard to understand :shrug:

[dhinojosa]

27. Slow down, I didn't bring up sex...

the previous poster did by inferring that only sex workers take money. I say differently.

[Mad_Dem_X]

28. Not true - I don't require money, I have my own

And I certainly don't need my husband to spend money on me before I'll have sex with him. Then again, I'm a woman, not a girl. LOL

[48pan]

31. You can't argue with pure logic! n/t