Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Check out this E-mail I received.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Floogeldy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 12:22 AM
Original message
Check out this E-mail I received.
"NORMANDY, FRANCE (June 6, 1944) Three hundred French civilians were killed and thousands more were wounded today in the first hours of America's invasion of continental Europe. Casualties were heaviest among women and children. Most of the French casualties were the result of Naval gunfire from American ships attempting to knock out German fortifications prior to the landing of hundreds of thousands of U.S. troops. Reports from a makeshift hospital in the French town of St. Mere Eglise said the carnage was far worse than the French had anticipated, and that reaction against the American invasion was running high. "We are dying for no reason, "said a Frenchman speaking on condition of anonymity. "Americans can't even shoot straight. I never thought I'd say this, but life was better under Adolph Hitler."

The invasion also caused severe environmental damage. American troops, tanks, trucks and machinery destroyed miles of pristine shoreline and thousands of acres of ecologically sensitive wetlands. It was believed that the habitat of the spineless French crab was completely wiped out, thus threatening the species with extinction. A representative of Greenpeace said his organization, which had tried to stall the invasion for over a year, was appalled at the destruction, but not surprised. "This is just another example of how the military destroys the environment without a second thought," said Christine Moanmore. "And it's all about corporate greed."

Contacted at his Manhattan condo, a member of the French government-in-exile, who abandoned Paris when Hitler invaded, said the invasion was based solely on American financial interests. "Everyone knows that President Roosevelt has ties to 'big beer'," said Pierre Le Wimp. "Once the German beer industry is conquered, Roosevelt's beer cronies will control the world market and make a fortune."

Administration supporters said America's aggressive actions were based in part on the assertions of controversial scientist Albert Einstein, who sent a letter to Roosevelt speculating that the Germans were developing a secret weapon - a so-called "atomic bomb". Such a weapon could produce casualties on a scale never seen before, and cause environmental damage that could last for thousands of years. Hitler has denied having such a weapon and international inspectors were unable to locate such weapons even after spending two long weekends in Germany. Shortly after the invasion began, reports surfaced that American soldiers had abused German prisoners. Mistreatment of Jews by Germans, at their so-called "concentration camps" has been rumored, but so far this remains unproven.

Several thousand Americans died during the first hours of the invasion, and French officials are concerned that the uncollected corpses will pose a public-health risk. "The Americans should have planned for this in advance," they said. "It's their mess, and we don't intend to help clean it up."

This has got to be bullshit. No source was cited in the mail. I searched Snopes but didn't find anything. Has anyone else seen this?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Pithlet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. It is bullshit
I haven't seen it, but it has crappy right wing email forward written all over it, and I don't get those anymore since I started replying to the people who used to send them to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. Pretty clearly BS
Greenpeace is not that old, is it?
the "spineless French crab" ha ha ha
"Christine Moanmore"
"Pierre Le Wimp"
sure those names are as real as "Wolf Blitzer"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. Pierre Le Wimp????? Christine Moanmore?? Greenpeace in 1944???
Edited on Thu Jun-30-05 12:34 AM by BrklynLiberal
You're kidding, right?

EDIT: http://www.greenpeace.org/international/about
Greenpeace has been campaigning against environmental degradation since 1971 when a small boat of volunteers and journalists sailed into Amchitka, an area north of Alaska where the US Government was conducting underground nuclear tests. This tradition of 'bearing witness' in a non-violent manner continues today, and our ships are an important part of all our campaign work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. It was going around a few months ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Traveler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
5. He's trying to draw a parallel
between the invasion of Normandy in WWII and the invasion of Iraq. There are several reasons why this won't wash:

1) France was occupied by a hostile foreign power. While Sadaam was a despot he was at least an Iraqi. Hitler was NOT French.

2) The German occupation force was loathed by most of the French, as evidenced by an active resistance that formed prior to the Allied invasion. There was no active resistance against Sadaam, though doubtless there were many who wished there were. The point is, the French were actively resisting and actively supporting the Allied invasion. The Iraqis were not.

3) The French regarded Americans as being culturally related to themselves. They had, after all, supported our own revolution. Thus there was a natural basis for trust. The Iraqis relate us to the Crusaders. Quite a difference in perspective, there ... no basis for trust.

4) In the final analysis, I cannot make you free. As Malcomn X said, "No one can give you your freedom and dignity. If you are a man, you will take it." The French wanted to be free of Hitler and were willing to bleed for it. I am unconvinced the Iraqis possess the same commitment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
6. The common neoconservative technique of argument: the WWII analogy
Everything in contemporary geopolitics must be analogous to World War II. Bush is Churchill. The Democrats are the appeasers. John Kerry is Neville Chamberlinn. Saddam/Osama/Kim Jong Il is Hitler. Yeah, yeah, whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
7. It's supposed to be a joke
How Would the D-Day Invasion be Reported today?

(This is what you would hear if TODAY'S MEDIA reported on D-Day at Normandy)

http://www.lug.ro/mlist/archive/humor/humor.2004-08/0130.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tsiyu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
8. Yeah, pure bullshit
trying to compare Normandy to Baghdad is ridiculous. Hitler had invaded or threatened how many nations at that point?

And Hussein was occupying how many countries when we invaded Iraq?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC