Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who would win in a civil war? (note, not meant to be taken too seriously)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 08:51 PM
Original message
Who would win in a civil war? (note, not meant to be taken too seriously)
The blue states or the red states?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tedoll78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. I dunno.
I've wondered myself. The GOP has been quite successful at moving military resources to the Red States, and I don't think they'd hesitate to nuke "the libruls."

On the other hand, the divide in this country is more Urban vs Rural, which puts Urbanites at a distinct disadvantage. Why? Our side has distinct targets to be captured. We have all of the major cities. What do they have - the old cotton gin? The antique store on town square? The honkey tonk bar on Old Highway 6 headin' outta town? They've got not much in terms of symbolic targets.

Then there are resources and foreign aid to consider. You can bet that we'd have pretty much the entire civilized world on our side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. You forget... Jenny Jones AND Ricky Lake are shot in Blue States
If we threaten to cut 'em off, they're bound to surrender.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. remember we have them flanked
if they concnetrate on Chicago and New York City, they'll be left vulnerable from California in the west.

but they could split chicago from new york by amassing troops in Ohio and Indiana.

We could hold them at washington DC.

Texas would be difficult.

Blue's strategy would be keep the reds at bay while california comes at them from the west.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. When your divisions are 2000 miles apart, enfilading fire won't work
They're not so much flanked as we are divided. Of course here in Houston, 20 blocks away from Enron headquarters, I'm somewhat behind enemy lines. Guess that makes me a spy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. theres a lot of population in our small space
NYC 8 million people
Chicago, a hell of a lot of people.

California would find little resistance in the mountains, and they would amass territory fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Alaska would be our Finland.
I guess I'm thinking of southern Illinois, too. It would fall fast, Chicago laid seige to, relief columns from Milwaukee ambushed as they caravaned down the coast. But the real nightmare would be the trench warfare along the Michigan-Ohio front, gunboat battles along Lake Erie, house to house fighting as General Granholm's corps pushed into the Cleveland suburbs.

Is Puerto Rico in this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. we'll have to hope Frodo can destroy the Ring in time
Edited on Wed Jul-27-05 09:46 PM by darboy
or for the batalions from Los Angeles, San Diego, San Francisco and Seattle to arrive.


It will take them several weeks to arrive. If Chicago and DC can hold out, we can waste them from the west
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Outrider Donating Member (126 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
36. Southern IL won't fall
Get some good guerrilla fighters down there and that would be a major thorn in the side of any force moving north into central Illinois. It would also make a good staging area for raids into Kentucky and the Ozarks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TXlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #8
40. Where in Houston are you?
KCDem and I are both in Houston, in the Copperfield area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. I think we'd be very vulnerable
in the west.

There's a lot of open ground to cover between california and any targets in Utah or Arizona.

Reno and Las Vegas would probably be capturable, especially with the blue support there, but we'd be pretty hard pressed to stage a good land invasion with no cover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. but there are no red forces in the west
theyd be crushed easily by the armies advancing from the west coast.

TX might put up a fight, but the red states would be more worried about NYC, Chicago and DC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I think they could
just mass in Utah, and take us out on our way across nevada. Ditto for Idaho.

I think we could hold the west coast, but that would be about it.

There are also a lot of red forces in California, and it's hard to say what that would do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 06:37 AM
Response to Reply #14
24. if you consider their red forces in CA
then youd have to also consider our blue forces in the South and texas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. This is true
I think it would be less like the Civil War and more like Bosnia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Outrider Donating Member (126 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #12
37. Not a lot of population.
Capture Las Vegas, Reno and Denver and then concentrate on controlling the major transportation lines only. Let them have the open spaces, not alot of places to hide and the areas were they can, can be quaritines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Niccolo_Macchiavelli Donating Member (641 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Red would be victorious
winner would be none though.

They have no moral boundaries, the higher up the more extreme...gives them way more ways to choose from. WMD, Camps, Genocide? wouldn't put it past the USreds. USblues wouldn't be blue if they stooped on that level.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solinvictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hmm...
The problem is that so many Dems seem to embrace gun control. Reds actively encourage it, but many Dems seem to favor more legislation, so I'd gather that the average Republican household was better armed than the average Democrat. Of course, here in the South, that may not hold true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Three words:
Large urban street gangs. Oh wait, that's four words. Never mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solinvictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Urban street gangs..
lack discipline. They'd be reduced to looter status quickly because they eat their own. It's like in LA in 1992, when the Korean shot back and threatened force, they moved along quickly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kraklen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #15
32. They're at least as disciplined as anything in the red states.
I'd roll with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
datasuspect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #32
39. strraight up
bobby joe and bubba ain't got nuffin on some stone g'd up muhfuckas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. we have guns in new england
if theres a shortage, we can borrow the cops'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VOX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
16. On technological and economic bases alone, the Blue States would win.
It takes $$$$ and technology to wage a civil war, and we have California, Washington, and New York for starters. BIG starters! :bounce:

:headbang:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solinvictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Cities and a civil war..
cities would be a liability. Once the food's cut off and public sanitation goes away, look for massive amounts of rioting and disease. I can't imagine a city like LA with no shipments of food for even a week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tedoll78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Well..
I could see there being a worldwide effort to resurrect a Blue State version of the Berlin Airlift. With the world on our side, the Red states wouldn't do too well..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hickman1937 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. Unless you armed them and pointed them to the red states.
Demonize the other side, and you have cannon fodder. Cities are full of people who know how to adjust, and survive against the odds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Felix Mala Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #17
28. Once we cut off all the federal largesse that funds their
Edited on Thu Jul-28-05 04:41 PM by Feles Mala
"independent" "true to original Constitutional intent" Red State lifestyles, their economies would quickly turn into the backwater, third-world economies that they really are. We might let them go quietly and swirl around for a few years, but sooner or later they're going to need people with brains. How much of the nations computing power would side with them?

Anyone ever see the great Ken Russel film "Billion Dollar Brain?" In it a crazy rich Texan tries to take out the Soviet Union in a single strike. Trouble is, his billion dollar computer which is organizing the effort has an unfortunate bug in it. If you were making that film today, the Texas idiot would attack Blue States and probably have the same problems. Who from Portland, Seattle or Silicon Valley is going to move to Houston, the new capital of the Confederacy of Dunces States?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
18. Blue because we are blue collar and smart
The reds are chickenhawks and gutless.

The only way Reds win is if they lie their way to victory
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilyhoney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
20. And I suppose
that while we civil war amongst ourselves, no other country would dare invade us? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dave Reynolds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
21. Hard to say,
but I wanna be a warlord.

Because then I could have cake any time I wanted it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hickman1937 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
22. Blue states have the water.
That's it. Slam dunk. Humans can live on short or subsistance rations of food for a long time. Use up your water, and you've got 3 days tops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Fuego Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
25. This is what the country really looks like:


There are are hardly any ideologiclally pure red states. I live in a blue tower in a red state according to this map. It's about ignorant yokels vs. educated urbanites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. wow
that's an awesome graphic!

thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BikeWriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. Hey, who says yokels can't be educated?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Fuego Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. Yeah, I forgot - we have an educated yokel in the White House.
So you are right. Mea culpa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BikeWriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Hey, that asshole is a New Englander!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 06:57 AM
Response to Reply #35
38. nope
we rejected him a long time ago, he's yours!

Why don't you ask him where he's from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. That's a nice map
Here's another one that I like.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shell Beau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
29. It would be a tie! We would become purple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalish Donating Member (402 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
33. Blue states have most of the industry
and virtually all the science...

What that would mean in a civil war I don't know, but it could be important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TXlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
41. Well, which side has more guns and military experience?
I'll give you a hint -- it's not us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
42. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #42
43. Dude, just stop!
You have posted the same damn thing on 30-some threads.

Couldn't you at least TRY to be creative?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. Well, he won't be posting that same old thing anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #44
45. Yeah, it's kinda early for pizza, but hey -
All your tombstones are belong to us!

}(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quagmire05 Donating Member (102 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
46. Ugg
Do we really need to think about the possibility of another War? Enough is enough
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
47. Hmm
The red states have the entire atlantic fleet and most of the non-nuclear Air-Force, the stealth fleet, and the all important South Dakota.

Of course, if we can get to Colorado Springs quickly (already a very blue area), we get the all important SAC (our ICBM's). Course we can't use them because they are in S. Dakota.

Blue states have the Pacific fleet, Persian Gulf and Indian Ocean fleets -- so better navy assets. We have a good sized force of Marines at Pendleton (counteracted by Camp Lejun in NC). Mirmar no longer exists, and I don't know of any other large army bases.

We would lose, but have enough to hang onto CA most likely. The real problem would be holding onto the eastern seaboard. Given that they essentially have no or few assets, we probably can't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC