This dude called National Geographic the poor man's Playboy.

[LoZoccolo]

:hide:

[Richardo]

1. Oasis fan?

:popcorn:

[4_Legs_Good]

2. LMAO

It probably actually costs more than Playboy!

:)

Actually I guess they both have the same amount of ads.

david

[LoZoccolo]

3. I think the implication might be...

...you go to the library to read it, or read your parents'.

[One_Life_To_Give]

4. But Ma never complained about reading Nat. Geographic.

However reading the other would have earned my a swat up side the head.

[sui generis]

5. gollee - that joke is about 50 years old

time for some new material whaddya think? :shrug:

[LoZoccolo]

6. I know.

It was like 1988 when this dude said it too.

[pnorman]

7. TITTY is the operative word here.

Way back before Playboy, that was the only "legit" mag where a young lad could feast his eyes on bare bosoms. Of course, they were all suitably dark-skinned native lasses, to keep within the bounds of propriety.

pnorman