Poll: Does Pat Robertson's apology satisfy you?

[Gothic Sponge]

Hell no! ;)

http://www.cnn.com/

[asthmaticeog]

1. Fuck that.

Nothing about him will ever satisfy me. Unless he happens to get fed into a mulcher. Slowly. Feet First.

[terrya]

2. He's a lying scumbag. Everything out of his mouth is a fucking lie.

Fuck no, his "apology" doesn't satisfy me.

[benburch]

3. It makes him into even more of a POS. nt

[jpgray]

4. "I didn't say 'assassination.' I said [we] should 'take him out'"

For coffee? For a sundae? On a bicycle built for two?

[Shoeempress]

5. "God" no.

[Hugin]

6. I am shaking with MORAL OUTRAGE!

Or maybe it's just a bit too much caffeine.

No... I am not satisfied.

[arwalden]

7. Poll Results: Yes 23% 3250 votes // No 77% 11049 votes

http://www.cnn.com/POLLSERVER/results/19680.exclude.html
Does Pat Robertson's apology, after calling for the assassination of Venezuela's president, satisfy you?

Yes 23% 3250 votes

No 77% 11049 votes
Total: 14299 votes


This QuickVote is not scientific and reflects the opinions of only those Internet users who have chosen to participate. The results cannot be assumed to represent the opinions of Internet users in general, nor the public as a whole. The QuickVote sponsor is not responsible for content, functionality or the opinions expressed therein.

[matt819]

8. Oh, sorry, I didn't mean assassinate him. . .

I meant kidnap him, or overthrow him. Gosh, golly, kill him? No, you've misinterpreted me.

Thanks, Pat, for that clarification. Thank goodness you didn't say that while baring a breast. Otherwise you might be penalized for these remarks.

[Shell Beau]

39. Right, like kidnapping someone

is an acceptable thing. What a hypocrite!

[bridgit]

9. omg no!!!!

:thumbsdown:

[RC]

10. Yeah, sure...

"The controversy began Monday when Robertson called Chavez "a terrific danger" bent on exporting Communism and Islamic extremism across the Americas."

Somehow Communism and Islamic extremism seem go together like Peace and george walker bu$h.

[youthere]

11. no No NO!

Wish someone would take HIM out.

[Debi]

16. to quote JPGray...

For coffee? For a sundae? On a bicycle built for two?


Or OUT, out?

[youthere]

19. I meant it in the very same context Robertson meant it.

[Debi]

21. Ohhhh, OUT then

I know nothing.......

[youthere]

26. LOL

[Debi]

12. The Rush Limbaugh school of broadcast journalism

I didn't say that, where did I say that, they're lying about what I said, I've been misquoted...Oh, you've got the tape? I DID say that? Well, I didn't MEAN that...they're misinterpreting what I said. Damn Liberal Media!

Okay, whatever, I'm, Um, sorry, and Now I will never speak of this again....Fallael...heheh..shout out to Billy O!

[khashka]

13. No fuckin' way

He's a prime example of what has gone wrong with Christianity. You gotta talk the talk and walk the walk. Talking the talk and then acting like an asshole doesn't cut it.

And no amount of "Oh, gee! I'm sorry" can change that. Playing games with semantics only increases his sin......

Khash.

[ComerPerro]

14. depends on the meaning of the word "is"

[Panda1]

15. No.

He didn't really apologize. First he lied instead. Then he said he didn't say assassinate. Then he had "qualifiers" on his supposed smarmy apology. I bet he had his fingers crossed behind his back too.

[Iris]

17. Why is there never a "HELL to the No!" when you need one?

Anyway, why does it matter if I'M satisfied? He hasn't called for my assassination!

[lpbk2713]

18. "I was misinterpreted by the press."

Apparently there's a lot of that going around. Katherine Harris was saying the same thing just last week.

Oh those poooor misunderstood nutjob wingnuts.

[xchrom]

20. nope.

[jbane]

22. Pat's not doing well here.

[sniffa]

23. he apoLogized? i thought he denied it?

:shrug:

[Pithlet]

24. No.

But, I find the trend of right wingers falling all over themselves attempting to deny and then retract their statements amusing.

[skygazer]

25. Of course not!

It's the same old bullshit thing of apologising when you get caught - he doesn't mean it, he's just trying to smooth people down.

[Left_Winger]

27. Absolutely not !!!

[sakabatou]

28. 78% No, 22% Yes

[gizmo1979]

29. Robertson belongs in a home!

Or assylum.

[4_Legs_Good]

30. He said "take him out" just like George Jr. said "take care of anyone..."

Us crazy liberals are just flying off the handle and mis-representing everything.

He MEANT "Take him out... for a glass of wine."

And George Jr. meant "I will take care of anyone involved with the Plame leak ... by giving them a nice promotion."

We're always jumping the gun and taking things out of context.

david

[Catchawave]

31. Still 79% no....

So, who are the insurgents that voted yes ????? Spooky.

[DemGirl7]

32. NO!!!!

He will only satisfy me if he would completely disappear from the face of the earth.

[Chovexani]

33. Off with his head!

Does that answer your question? :evilgrin:

[HEyHEY]

34. No, but his arrest and transfer to gitmo will

[Zuni]

35. Pat still has like 50,000 other obnoxious statements to apologize for

no, I am not satisfied

[Applan]

36. Oh yeah, everythings Hunky Dory now

I've already forgotten he said it

[lpbk2713]

37. Final tally 78% No ... 22% Yes..... I'd call that a mandate.

A mandate to go to Hell and STFU.

[Shell Beau]

38. I am sure he

is only apologizing b/c he "has" too! But I will say that I am glad he did even if it doesn't mean shit. I don't believe he is really sorry for one minute, but it's better than nothing. But he's a huge hypocrite.

[CitrusLib]

40. About as satisfying as a rice cake after a 3-day fast.