Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SOLVED: The "potted meat" and "Mechanically separated chicken" mysteries

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 05:35 PM
Original message
SOLVED: The "potted meat" and "Mechanically separated chicken" mysteries
http://www.thewavemag.com/pagegen.php?pagename=article&articleid=24695



Surprisingly, this staple of the boxcar hobo diet is available in virtually every supermarket, usually tucked between cans of tuna and pre-made chili. At a total cost of $1.47, we picked up two three-ounce cans of Armour Potted Meat (dubbed “America’s Favorite” on the can) and one 5.5-ounce can of Libby’s Potted Meat Food Product. Total combined nutritional value: 510 calories, 38 grams of fat, and for all you Atkins dieters, a whopping 47 grams of protein and no carbs. While perusing the unique nutritional statistics on the label, our eyes were inevitably drawn to the ingredients: Mechanically separated chicken, beef tripe, partially defatted cooked beef fatty tissue, beef hearts, water, partially defatted cooked pork fatty tissue, salt and less than 2% mustard, garlic, vinegar, sodium erythorbate, sodium nitrite, natural flavors.

While beef hearts and beef tripe (the hard-to-digest muscular lining of the bovine stomach) sounded like things you would only eat on Fear Factor if promised a fabulous cash prize, at least they were recognizable. Mechanically separated chicken just sounded evil. Without delay, we dialed the 800 number on the Armour can to get some answers. “Mechanically separated chicken (MSC) is just chicken that has been separated by a machine,” claimed “Cindy,” a customer service representative from the Dial Corporation, owner of Armour Foods. “If you want to know more, I’ll have to transfer you to a product specialist.”

“These companies are famous for not talking about much of anything, actually,” says Richard Lobb, spokesman for the National Chicken Council, the only chicken industry lobbying group willing to speak on the record about mechanically separated chicken. “They tend to not like to talk about how they fabricate some of these manufactured products.”

Could Lobb shed some light on the mystery of mechanically separated chicken? Unfortunately, yes. “The mechanical separator basically has a screw and a drive, and it just presses the chicken part against a fine screen at incredibly high pressure and the meat is squeezed off through a sieve. It’s usually dark meat from the drumstick or the thigh or possibly the back, which has meat that’s been locked up in the bones.” In other words, these are the scraps that the human separators simply cannot pick off. “I’ve actually seen them make it at the plant,” said Lobb, in a rare moment of frankness. “It looks like pink toothpaste when it comes out of the machine.” MSC can also be found in hot dogs, where it cannot exceed 12% of the contents and is required by law to be labeled as mechanically separated meat. But what about the oxymoronic-sounding “partially defatted cooked beef/pork fatty tissue.” Not even Richard Lobb could explain that one. However, our exhaustive search of supermarket ingredient labels found only one other product which contained this substance: dog food.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mark11727 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Alright, but I *still* like SPAM...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Even with the "machine separated chicken?"
I tried, about a year ago, to relive a part of my childhood by frying up some SPAM.

Within seconds the whole kitchen smelled like rancid grease...and I cooked it in a non-stick pan with no added fat (not even "Pam" spray).

As much as I hate to waste food, I made an exception in this case.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prole_for_peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. my mom got upset when she found out my grandmother had given
me a potted meat sandwich. i guess i was about 11 or 12 at the time. my grandmother (dad's mom, very country) ate that kind of stuff all the time. my mom told her (very nicely) that i wasn't to eat it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretzel4gore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. hmmm
in a crunch, post apocalypse say, i fear you and your mom maybe even be forced to.... i mean, gran's are so generous of themselves anyway, aren't they!
(why your anecdote reminded me of harlan ellison's 'a boy loves his dog' i don't know, but your mom sounds like ....a survivor!) lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prole_for_peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. post apocalypse all bets are off.
but when there are other choices available....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yumm

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. From the Natl. Food Safety Database: Mechanically Separated Poultry
Mechanically Separated Poultry
is a paste-like poultry product produced by forcing crushed bone and tissue through a sieve or similar device to separate bone from tissue. Mechanically separated poultry has been used in poultry products since 1969 after the National Academy of Sciences found it safe for use. In 1995 the final rule on mechanically separated poultry said it was safe to use without restrictions. However, it must be labeled as "mechanically separated chicken or turkey" in the ingredient statement. The final rule became effective Nov. 1996.

Still pretty damn disgusting. (this was mine, not the NFS')
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiepunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Wow,
I feel like laughing and puking. :rofl: :puke: But then I have a sick sense of humor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smbolisnch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. That is beyond disgusting.
And on so many levels. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Hah! That's nothing. Let me introduce to you...............


Oh, c'mon...it's in MILK GRAVY!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smbolisnch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. That cannot be real.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark11727 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-05 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. That doesn't look like it's Atkins-approved...
...and my GAWD, look at the cholesterol levels!

Instant myocardial infarction in a can. Ug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-05 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #10
20. Damm, with that many milligrams of cholesterol it would...
have to be consumed over an 11.7 day period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-05 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #6
19. Sicker than what I thought it was- a chicken sitting on a centrifuge.
Blaaaaah!:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LincolnMcGrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
11. It is in Bologna and many other products as well.
MMMMMMM Tastes like chicken........paste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
miss_kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
12. looks like pet food.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Purrfessor Donating Member (463 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
14. Mechanically separated chicken sounds like it could be Roadkill
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
15. Man, that's kinda unfair....
I used to eat potted meat AND Vienna sausages a LOT before i got worried about all the fat and sodium....

Potted meat didn't used to be so bad. Think fatty pork meatloaf, cooked until it turns to mush, ground fine, packed into a crock, and then sealed with a layer of pork fat poured over the top...

In a fancy restaraunt, they call it a "terrine" and charge you $47.50 for it....

Veenie Weenies wre a LOT better when they didn't put that chicken paste in 'em....

They call me "Iron Chef Redneck BigJawnn"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheWhoMustBeObeyed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
16. Yrs ago I knew someone who worked on marketing for Armour Meats
One day he explained how the meats are processed. Potted meat product, he said, is informally known as the "five-T" product, based on what goes into it: tits, twats, tongues, tails and toes. "They use everything but the squeal," he said, relishing my nauseated expression. I've never forgotten it. How could I?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-05 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
18. Dave Barry wrote something very similar to this
about 15 years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
the_spectator Donating Member (932 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-05 02:20 AM
Response to Original message
21. But what did it taste like?
Since you spent the $1.47 for all this research, you could have at least done that as well! :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC