So who would like to become the third leg of MisU and I?

[nothingshocksmeanymore]

We aren't taking applications, we just thought it would be fun to know :D

[WCGreen]

1. I know the applications are not open to everyone....

But heh, what the hell......

[bridgit]

2. there are so many more worthy then i...

:cry:

[Elidor]

3. I don't have the right appliances

Too many protuberances, and whatnot. But this thread should get interesting. :popcorn:

[southlandshari]

4. Ahem......

[CaliforniaPeggy]

5. Hmmm...

Sounds interesting...

I'd love to have you consider my application....

:evilgrin:

[sundog]

6. i already know who's gonna win

and it ain't me

:yoiks:

:P

[nothingshocksmeanymore]

7. MisU just said I unintentionally excluded all the DU grammar police

fuck them. I have a head cold.

[merh]

8. The world as I knew it has changed drastically,

it's that begin anew, future open for all possibilites. Where do I apply? :hi:

[nothingshocksmeanymore]

9. You can't fool me. You're just lookin' for a home!

:hug:

Wanted to prove you still had your sense of humor so all was not lost!;) :loveya:

[merh]

10. Damn - you figured me out!

:argh:

They can't take my sense of humor, I won't ever give that up! Now, about that home, I mean application ;-)

:loveya:

[progmom]

11. That's "MisU and me"

:P

[southlandshari]

12. You've got competition, darlin'

No matter WHAT sundog says!

;)

[ornotna]

13. Fuck yes!

A Manwich. Woo hoo!



Hey , I can dream. :P

[REP]

14. Well, I DO Have a Thing for MisU...

No, not that kind of thing - I'm an innie.

[Beware the Beast Man]

15. Sheesh, don't we have enough of that in here already?

:D

[nothingshocksmeanymore]

18. I'm surprised you and Mrs Beast haven't had this idea already

[sundog]

20. they did. it failed miserably. don't ask for details.

:P

[johnnie]

16. I know I'm out

But it's worth a try. :hi:

[hunter]

17. I've been a third leg.

Never, never, again! Damn near killed my guardian angel.

[Wapsie B]

19. Hmmmmmm

Voyeur? Hell yes. Third leg? I've actually been asked before that maybe sometime if the mood strikes........there does seem to be a lot of it around here, but people are people, and do things people do......

[Coventina]

21. Hey NSMA, this is slightly off topic but I was wondering

If you wouldn't mind taking a look at this article:

http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/Issues/current/news/feature.html

I won't ask you to READ it, because it's pretty lengthy. But if you could just glance over it and tell me your impression I'd really like to know what you think of this issue.

It raises some interesting things about women's sexuality that I had been thinking about, but I don't know if I totally buy all the points that the writer might be trying to make.

[nothingshocksmeanymore]

22. I did read the whole thing

One big problem with these articles that surmise that women are more likely to be open to other sexual experiences than men is that they don't explain how there are way more gay men than women. That is because (in my view) men are ten times more likely to be closeted than women.

A man will not tell the truth on a questionairre even if he is sure no one will know who he is.

As for the points about female sexuality in the article...I'm not sure I buy them. For the younger woman it is very much like the awe of discovering dinosaurs but for older women who have raised their kids and all of a sudden find themselves in a relationship with a woman it is far different.

THe article in my view was more entertainment than academia.

[Coventina]

23. Wow! Well, I feel kind of bad now. Sorry I sucked you into reading the

whole thing.

I certainly agree that it's more entertainment than serious research.
You should see the cover photo of the two "hot girls" kissing!

I've been kind of poo-pooing this latest trend of "hot girls" all over each other because, IMHO, it does seem to be a show for the guys.

But by the end of the article I was just confused.

Now I'm kind of wondering to myself if this "hot girls" action is a symptom of uber-patriarchy......I dunno....
:shrug:

Well, that's what I get for reading "New Times" I guess.

Sorry! But thanks for your time!
:pals:

[leftofthedial]

24. I suppose I'd do it

but that would be kind of weird, wouldn't it?